ArticleScientific reports2025
Octenidine effectively reduces Candida auris colonisation on human skin.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Octenidine or Sterile Water Cleansing and Late-Onset Sepsis in Neonates in the NICU: A Randomized Clinical Trial.JAMA network open · 2026Trial
- Pathogenicity and virulence ofVirulence · 2026Review
- Enhanced activity of octiset® versus octenidine against polymicrobial bacterial vaginosis biofilmsBiofilm · 2026Article
- In Vitro Antifungal Activity of Octenidine Against Emerging Dermatophyte Species.Mycopathologia · 2026Article
- Review
- A Carboxyl-Functionalized Graphene Quantum Dot Coating for Catheters Effective Against Emerging Drug-ResistantJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Article
- Natural clearance time and effect of manuka honey body wash and oral probiotics on colonization ofFrontiers in public health · 2026Article
- StudyingPharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Candidozyma (formerly Candida) auris (C. auris), a WHO critical priority pathogen known for its multi-drug resistance and strong skin tropism, is posing a significant health threat. This study evaluates the efficacy of commercial octenidine-based antiseptics in reducing C. auris colonisation on intact and wounded human skin. Using an established ex vivo human skin model to simulate clinical settings, skin samples from healthy donors were exposed to planktonic C. auris cells. Six hours post-contamination, two ready-to-use octenidine-based antiseptics were applied, and fungal colonisation was assessed after 18 h via periodic acid-Schiff staining, bright field and scanning electron microscopy and colony forming unit quantification. In vitro biofilm assays with various C. auris strains, including drug resistant ones, were performed to determine the antifungal effects of octenidine formulations. Results showed that octenidine-based antiseptics significantly reduced C. auris viability on intact and wounded human skin, and also demonstrated a nearly complete eradication across tested strains in vitro. These findings highlight the potential of octenidine-based products in reducing C. auris colonisation, supporting infection prevention and control strategies in healthcare settings and enhancing patient safety.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.