ArticleScientific reports2025
Continuous reuse of polyamide 12 in powder bed fusion.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The thermal degradation of polymers in powder bed fusion (PBF) is one of the major issues preventing wider adoption of this technology at the production scale. Although standard PBF allows for elastic production of complex parts in a single-step manufacturing process, it is materially inefficient. This is because only approximately 10% of the material is used to develop parts, while the majority of semicrystalline polyamide 12 (PA12) remain unused. The recovered powder cannot be directly reused in subsequent processes because it remains at high temperatures, above the glass transition and below the melting point for a long time during printing. In this work, we present a novel way to process PA12 at room temperature without exposure to a thermal agent. Dual beam laser sintering (DBLS) uses a double laser system that effectively compensates for the temperature in the melting zone and prevents material shrinkage. To demonstrate the effectiveness of the DBLS method, the material was kept in a closed loop. Specimens from each iteration of the process (n = 4) were analyzed. No significant changes were observed in the chemical properties (molecular weight and melt viscosity, assessed via gel permeation chromatography (GPC) and melt flow index (MFI) analysis), rheological properties (flowability and size distribution) nor in the particle shape of the powder samples. Mechanical properties of the built specimens, when compared with the initial values, proved to be satisfactory.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.