ArticleScientific reports2025
A triple pronged approach for ulcerative colitis severity classification using multimodal, meta, and transformer based learning.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Recent Advances in Artificial Intelligence for Endoscopic and Multimodal Assessment of Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Review.International journal of general medicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Ulcerative colitis (UC) is a chronic inflammatory disorder necessitating precise severity stratification to facilitate optimal therapeutic interventions. This study harnesses a triple-pronged deep learning methodology-including multimodal inference pipelines that eliminate domain-specific training, few-shot meta-learning, and Vision Transformer (ViT)-based ensembling-to classify UC severity within the HyperKvasir dataset. We systematically evaluate multiple vision transformer architectures, discovering that a Swin-Base model achieves an accuracy of 90%, while a soft-voting ensemble of diverse ViT backbones boosts performance to 93%. In parallel, we leverage multimodal pre-trained frameworks (e.g., CLIP, BLIP, FLAVA) integrated with conventional machine learning algorithms, yielding an accuracy of 83%. To address limited annotated data, we deploy few-shot meta-learning approaches (e.g., Matching Networks), attaining 83% accuracy in a 5-shot context. Furthermore, interpretability is enhanced via SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP), which interpret both local and global model behaviors, thereby fostering clinical trust in the model's inferences. These findings underscore the potential of contemporary representation learning and ensemble strategies for robust UC severity classification, highlighting the pivotal role of model transparency in facilitating medical image analysis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.