ArticleScientific reports2025
Vaginal biomechanical function in premenopausal and postmenopausal women with and without pelvic organ prolapse.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Raman spectroscopy for nondestructive detection of vaginal tissue alterations in the fibulin-5 murine model of pelvic organ prolapse.Biophotonics discovery · 2026Article
- Spectral photoacoustic imaging of age-related reproductive tract collagen changes in a mouse model of prolapse.Photoacoustics · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The vagina plays a vital role in childbirth, and compromised vaginal mechanical integrity can lead to pelvic organ prolapse (POP). Animal studies highlight the biaxial mechanical response of pelvic organs, however, it has not yet been assessed in the human vagina with POP. Therefore, the objective of this study was to quantify the biaxial biomechanical properties of vaginal tissue in pre-and postmenopausal women across POP stages. In postmenopausal patients, circumferential toe-region modulus decreased in POP-III compared to POP-II (p = 0.041), and longitudinal toe-region modulus decreased in POP-III compared to non-POP and POP-II (p = 0.026 and 0.031). Conversely, no statistically significant changes were observed in premenopausal patients across POP stages. Directional differences in vaginal modulus were evident in premenopausal non-POP and POP-II (p = 0.006 and 0.001) but were absent in POP-III and postmenopausal groups. These findings suggested that POP impacts vaginal biomechanics differently in pre-and postmenopausal women, likely reflecting distinct underlying processes. Additionally, a preliminary study using non-destructive 3D microscopy demonstrated the potential for whole-tissue microstructure quantification of the vagina. Further investigation into the microstructural changes of vaginal tissue is essential to better understand these differences and guide the development of targeted interventions for POP.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.