ArticleScientific reports2025
Safety and efficacy of individualized modified total neoadjuvant therapy for low locally advanced rectal cancer.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Multiparametric MRI radiomics nomogram predicts synchronous distant metastasis in rectal cancer.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Emergency rectal cancer: clinical presentation and therapeutic options.Frontiers in surgery · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Various studies have confirmed the benefits of total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT) for locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC). Nevertheless, preoperative intensive treatment and a long waiting period can lead to significant side effects. This may result in surgical difficulties and a higher complication rate. The individualized modified TNT (mTNT) model might lessen the side effects without influencing the curative effect. The clinical data of LARC with short-course neoadjuvant radiotherapy and chemotherapy in the same attending group of colorectal surgery at Fujian Cancer Hospital were retrospectively examined from January 2017 to October 2023. An analysis was carried out on aspects such as the adverse reaction of chemoradiotherapy, postoperative complications, pathological withdrawal, and long-term outcomes of the data. 62 cases were enrolled, including 16 cases of induction chemotherapy mode (IC group), 20 cases of consolidation chemotherapy mode (CC group), and 26 cases of induction + consolidation chemotherapy sandwich mode (IC + CC group). In all three groups, the neoadjuvant therapy compliance rate reached 100%. No grade 4-5 toxicity was found, and the perioperative complication rate of 12.90% was within an acceptable range, including major complications, 4 cases of anastomotic leakage and one case of abdominal bleeding. Delayed complications including ileus and rectovaginal fistula occured in 5 patients, all of whom received consolidation chemotherapy and had BMI less than 21. There was a total pathological complete remission (pCR) rate of 24.19%, including IC group 18.75%, CC group 25.00%, and IC + CC group 26.92%. The downstaging rate of IC + CC group was significantly higher than that of IC group and CC group (P = 0.037). In comparison with those in the CC or IC + CC group, patients in the IC group, had lower Locoregional relapse-free survival (LRFS) rate (81.3%vs.82.5% and 92.9%, respectively, P = 0.292), and higher Distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) rate (93.8% vs.73.1% and 82.4%, respectively, P = 0.365), however, these variances were not of significance. The initial outcomes of the individualized modified TNT model are promising. Sequencing adjusted according to the disease risk upon presentation might be the best way to balance local and distant disease control and treatment toxicity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.