ArticleScientific reports2025
Integrated physiological, transcriptomic and metabolomic analysis of the response of Brassica napus L. to pruning residues from tea plant.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In the process of tea garden management, the pruned tea plant branches usually return directly to the field, which may interfere adjacent plant growth and resource waste. Therefore, it is essential to properly manage and economically utilize pruned tea plant branches. This study was combined physiology, transcriptomics, and metabolomics to analyze the effects of uncomposted and composted tea plant branches (UT and CT, respectively) on seed germination and seedling growth of Brassica napus L. The results demonstrated that the phenolic chemicals (tea polyphenols and catechins) and alkaloid (caffeine) in CT were reduced by over 84.56-99.57% compared to UT. The CT extracts solution promoted seed germination and seedling growth, while the UT extracts solution had the opposite effect. Comprehensive transcriptomic and metabolomic analyses revealed that the primary pathways affected were phenylpropanoid biosynthesis, plant hormone signal transduction, and MAPK signal pathway - plant. These results showed that UT extracts solution may affect the B. napus L. growth by disrupting the plant hormonal balance and antioxidant system. These results of this study indicate that in situ aerobic composting is a plant-friendly method for converting pruned tea plant branches into organic fertilizer and provides a theoretical basis for the resource utilization of pruned tea plant branches.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.