ArticleScientific reports2025
Drone hyperspectral imaging and artificial intelligence for monitoring moss and lichen in Antarctica.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Projected compositional reorganization of Southern plant assemblages in South Korea under climate scenarios using species distribution models.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Improving sugar beet canopy mapping through UAV image analysis.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Uncrewed aerial vehicles (UAVs) have become essential for remote sensing in extreme environments like Antarctica, but detecting moss and lichen using conventional red, green, blue (RGB) and multispectral sensors remains challenging. This study investigates the potential of hyperspectral imaging (HSI) for mapping cryptogamic vegetation and presents a workflow combining UAVs, ground observations, and machine learning (ML) classifiers. Data collected during a 2023 summer expedition to Antarctic Specially Protected Area 135, East Antarctica, were used to evaluate 12 configurations derived from five ML models, including gradient boosting (XGBoost, CatBoost) and convolutional neural networks (CNNs) (G2C-Conv2D, G2C-Conv3D, and UNet), tested with full and light input feature sets. The results show that common indices like normalised difference vegetation index (NDVI) are inadequate for moss and lichen detection, while novel spectral indices are more effective. Full models achieved high performance, with CatBoost and UNet reaching 98.3% and 99.7% weighted average accuracy, respectively. Light models using eight key wavelengths (i.e., 404, 480, 560, 655, 678, 740, 888, and 920 nm) performed well, with CatBoost at 95.5% and UNet at 99.8%, demonstrating suitability for preliminary monitoring of moss health and lichen. These findings underscore the importance of key spectral bands for large-scale HSI monitoring using UAVs and satellites in Antarctica, especially in geographic regions with limited spectral range.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.