ArticleScientific reports2025
Finite element analysis of anterior spanning attachment devices for supporting biomechanical stability in diaphyseal femoral periprosthetic fracture fixation.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Advances in functional nanomaterials and piezoelectric biomaterials for personalized intramedullary fixation: addressing age-related orthopedic challenges.Frontiers in chemistry · 2026Review
- Finite Element Analysis of Von Mises Stress in External Fixators for Open Tibial Fractures: A Comparative Study of ASTM F1541-02 and Tibia-Based Models in Indonesian Patients.Healthcare technology lettersArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The incidence of periprosthetic femoral fractures has increased in recent years. Osteosynthetic stabilisation is challenging, particularly for UCS IV.3-C fractures. Lateral plate osteosynthesis is the gold standard; however, it allows excessive vibration, leading to plate breakage. Orthogonal double plate osteosynthesis has been established but requires considerable intraoperative dissection of the anterior extensor muscle. This work aims to analyse newly developed plate designs that demonstrate adequate vibration behaviour, which, in turn, promotes callus healing and causes less soft tissue trauma than the plate constructs used to date. A hip prosthesis geometry and a parameterised volume geometry of a UCS IV.3-C type periprosthetic femur fracture were simulated to generate a finite element model. Additionally, three alternative design studies were developed to optimise an LCP®, and the various constructs were then investigated using a finite element model concerning comparative stress and deformation under static and dynamic loading and their influence on fracture gap expansion. Isolated lateral plate osteosynthesis (V1) and double plate osteosynthesis (V2) served as references. The alternative plate designs include a ventral frame at the fracture level (V3) or spanning the length of the lateral LCP® (V4). The fifth variant is a fulcrum support attached to the existing LCP® at the fracture level (V5). Compared with V1, V3 and V4 yielded comparable results, presenting greater stiffness and increased survival. The functionality of V5 shows nearly identical outcomes to those of V1. Here, failure with plastic deformation is already observed under static loading, which does not occur with V2 even under dynamic loading, thus representing the most stable construct, albeit one that does not permit adequate vibration behaviour. For V3 and V4, optimal strain behaviour in the fracture gap is also evident after load application. Alternative implant design variants with an additional anterior frame lead to reduced deformation and failure of fixation in UCS IV.3-C periprosthetic femur fractures. In addition to double plate osteosynthesis, alternative plate constructs exhibit optimal strain behaviour conducive to callus fracture healing. Furthermore, the selected designs decrease the required dissection of the quadriceps muscle.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.