ArticleScientific reports2025
Classification of musculoskeletal pain using machine learning.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Automated classification of musculoskeletal abnormalities using a dynamic ensemble of deep vision models.Medical & biological engineering & computing · 2026Article
- Factors associated with work-related musculoskeletal disorders using machine learning approaches: a systematic review.Annals of occupational and environmental medicine · 2026Review
- Global trends and hotspots of artificial intelligence in pain management: A bibliometric analysis.Digital healthArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Musculoskeletal pain is a significant health concern affecting individuals across various demographics and professions, often leading to reduced productivity and impaired quality of life. This study proposes a framework leveraging Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO) to evaluate and assess musculoskeletal pain risk based on a comprehensive dataset encompassing demographic, professional, physical, and lifestyle characteristics. The dataset includes detailed information on individuals' pain experiences across multiple body regions, providing a robust foundation for identifying correlations and risk factors. By integrating PSO with neural networks, this framework aims to enhance the detection of pain risk patterns, offering insights into the interplay between various factors and musculoskeletal health. The proposed framework involves data preprocessing, definition of neural network architecture, implementation of PSO, and performance evaluation. The dataset, containing 350 entries, was preprocessed to handle missing values, balance class distributions using SMOTE, and normalize features. A fully connected feedforward neural network with a single hidden layer was employed, with PSO optimizing the network's weights and biases. Performance was evaluated using metrics including accuracy, precision, recall, F1-score, and AUC-ROC. The results demonstrate that the PSO-optimized neural network effectively identifies musculoskeletal pain risk, achieving strong performance across all evaluation metrics (accuracy 95.8-100%). Key determinants such as age, BMI, exercise frequency, and occupational factors were identified, providing valuable insights for targeted interventions. The framework's performance compares favorably with conventional approaches, highlighting the potential of optimization techniques in musculoskeletal pain assessment and the development of preventive strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.