Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40715229›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Development of a self-report scale to assess relaxation effects of flavors and fragrances.

Yoko Hosokawa, Yukio Goto, Kunihide Hoshino, Kensuke Okada

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Yoko HosokawaCorporate Research & Development Division, Takasago International Corporation, Hiratsuka, Japan. yoko_hosokawa@takasago.com.
Yukio GotoCorporate Research & Development Division, Takasago International Corporation, Hiratsuka, Japan.
Kunihide HoshinoCorporate Research & Development Division, Takasago International Corporation, Hiratsuka, Japan.
Kensuke OkadaGraduate School of Education, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Stress is a modern social problem, and it is critical to cope with stress effectively to maintain one's mental health. Several studies have demonstrated that relaxation helps alleviate depression and anxiety. Although several studies have assessed the relaxation effects of odors, currently, no unified method exists that measures these subjective effects properly and efficiently. To address this gap, we developed the Relaxation Scale of Flavors and Fragrances (RSFF) and examined its structure, reliability, and validity. Two repeated surveys were administered among 110 participants to assess the relaxation effects of flavors and fragrances. The exploratory factor analysis results based on the first survey revealed a three-factor structure as follows: liberation, nostalgia, and negative emotions. Confirmatory factor analysis based on the second survey confirmed this structure. Reliability testing confirmed excellent internal consistency based on Cochran's alpha, and satisfactory test-retest reliability based on the correlation coefficient between the two repeated surveys' results. Correlations with the Profile of Mood States revealed satisfactory construct validity. This study's findings establish the RSFF as a tool for assessing the subjective relaxation effects of flavors and fragrances.

Indexed as

Flavoring AgentsPerfumeRelaxationSelf ReportAdultEmotionsFactor Analysis, StatisticalFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedOdorantsReproducibility of ResultsSurveys and QuestionnairesYoung AdultFlavoring AgentsPerfumeConstruct validityNostalgiaOdorPsychological scaleRelaxationTest–retest reliability

Identifiers

PMID40715229
PMCPMC12297476

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.