ArticleScientific reports2025
Enhanced EEG signal classification in brain computer interfaces using hybrid deep learning models.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Improving cognitive stress classification via multimodal EEG and ECG fusion: gender differences in physiological response.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Deep Hybrid CNN-BiLSTM-Attention Model for EEG Classification Using Wavelet Features.Annals of neurosciences · 2026Article
- Methodological optimization for eliciting robust median nerve somatosensory evoked potentials for realtime single trial applications.Journal of neural engineering · 2026Article
- Leednet: a lightweight network for event detection in EEG signals.Journal on advances in signal processing · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Brain-computer interfaces (BCIs) establish a communication pathway between the human brain and external devices by decoding neural signals. This study focuses on enhancing the classification of Motor Imagery (MI) within BCI systems by leveraging advanced machine learning and deep learning techniques. The accurate classification of electroencephalogram (EEG) data is crucial for enhancing BCI performance. The BCI architecture processes electroencephalography signals through three critical stages: data pre-processing, feature extraction, and classification. The research evaluates the performance of five traditional machine learning classifiers- K-Nearest Neighbors (KNN), Support Vector Classifier (SVC), Logistic Regression (LR), Random Forest (RF), and Naive Bayes (NB)-using the "PhysioNet EEG Motor Movement/Imagery Dataset". This dataset encompasses EEG data from various motor tasks, including both actual and imagined movements. Among the traditional classifiers, Random Forest achieved the highest accuracy of 91%, underscoring its efficacy in motor imagery classification within BCI systems. In addition to conventional approaches, the study also explores deep learning techniques, with Convolutional Neural Networks (CNN) and Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) networks yielding accuracies of 88.18% and 16.13%, respectively. However, the proposed hybrid model, which synergistically combines CNN and LSTM, significantly surpasses both traditional machine learning and individual deep learning methods, achieving an exceptional accuracy of 96.06%. This substantial improvement highlights the potential of hybrid deep learning models to advance the state of the art in BCI systems, offering a more robust and precise approach to motor imagery classification.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.