ArticleScientific reports2025
Deep learning-based image classification for integrating pathology and radiology in AI-assisted medical imaging.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Role of Artificial Intelligence in Cleft Lip and/or Cleft Palate in Diagnosis and Detection-An Umbrella Review.Clinical and experimental dental research · 2026Pooled it
- Multimodal artificial intelligence in retinal vascular and neovascular macular diseases: a systematic review of diagnostic and prognostic applications.BMC ophthalmology · 2025Pooled it
- Pioneering efficient deep learning architectures for enhanced hepatocellular carcinoma prediction and clinical translation.World journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2026Article
- Molecular immunopharmacology of traditional Chinese medicine-derived compounds in membranous nephropathy: mechanistic insights into immune aging and kidney essence deficiency.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- Emerging Approaches in Breast Cancer: From Molecular Mechanisms to Diagnosis and Therapeutic Strategies.Oncology research · 2026Review
- AI-Powered Histology for Molecular Profiling in Brain Tumors: Toward Smart Diagnostics from Tissue.Cancers · 2025Review
- Artificial intelligence in multidisciplinary tumor boards enhancing decision making and clinical outcomes in oncology.iScience · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The integration of pathology and radiology in medical imaging has emerged as a critical need for advancing diagnostic accuracy and improving clinical workflows. Current AI-driven approaches for medical image analysis, despite significant progress, face several challenges, including handling multi-modal imaging, imbalanced datasets, and the lack of robust interpretability and uncertainty quantification. These limitations often hinder the deployment of AI systems in real-world clinical settings, where reliability and adaptability are essential. To address these issues, this study introduces a novel framework, the Domain-Informed Adaptive Network (DIANet), combined with an Adaptive Clinical Workflow Integration (ACWI) strategy. DIANet leverages multi-scale feature extraction, domain-specific priors, and Bayesian uncertainty modeling to enhance interpretability and robustness. The proposed model is tailored for multi-modal medical imaging tasks, integrating adaptive learning mechanisms to mitigate domain shifts and imbalanced datasets. Complementing the model, the ACWI strategy ensures seamless deployment through explainable AI (XAI) techniques, uncertainty-aware decision support, and modular workflow integration compatible with clinical systems like PACS. Experimental results demonstrate significant improvements in diagnostic accuracy, segmentation precision, and reconstruction fidelity across diverse imaging modalities, validating the potential of this framework to bridge the gap between AI innovation and clinical utility.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.