Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40715154›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Validation of a rapid biomarker assay for lung cancer using the IntelliPlex panel.

Sandra Satie Koide, Breno Jeha Araújo, Juliana Doblas Massaro, Renata de Godoy E Silva, Rodrigo Dienstmann, Fernanda Christtanini Koyama Ribeiro

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Sandra Satie KoideOC Medicina de Precisão Oncoclínicas&Co São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Breno Jeha AraújoOC Medicina de Precisão Oncoclínicas&Co São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Juliana Doblas MassaroOC Medicina de Precisão Oncoclínicas&Co São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Renata de Godoy E SilvaOC Medicina de Precisão Oncoclínicas&Co São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Rodrigo DienstmannOC Medicina de Precisão Oncoclínicas&Co São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Fernanda Christtanini Koyama RibeiroOC Medicina de Precisão Oncoclínicas&Co São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil. fernanda.koyama@ocpmedicine.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A large proportion of non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients harbor clinically actionable genomic alterations, detected in general by broad Next-Generation Sequencing (NGS) panels, since it is the gold standard test and strongly recommended by different societies. However, high failure rates due to preanalytical factors and long turnaround times are still hindering rapid treatment decision taking in the real-world setting. The objective of this study was to validate the IntelliPlex Lung Cancer Panel by πCODE Technology for biomarker detection using clinical specimens compared to NGS as the gold standard methodology. A total of fifty-eight (58) Formalin-Fixed Paraffin-Embedded tissue (FFPE) samples from fifty-three (53) patients diagnosed with advanced lung adenocarcinoma and 2 reference controls were used. Overall, the test presented 97,73% sensitivity, 100% specificity and 98,15% accuracy. The IntelliPlex Lung Cancer Panel DNA presented 98% agreement, and the IntelliPlex Lung Cancer Panel RNA presented 100% agreement between the results obtained from the CGP NGS methodology. The IntelliPlex Lung Cancer Panel by πCODE Technology demonstrates high specificity and sensitivity for use in clinical laboratories to routine detection for actionable mutations and fusions in NSCLC tumor samples, with high potential to become an alternative to broad NGS panels according to pre-analytical factors.

Indexed as

Biomarkers, TumorCarcinoma, Non-Small-Cell LungLung NeoplasmsAgedFemaleHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHumansMaleMiddle AgedMutationSensitivity and SpecificityBiomarkers, Tumor

Identifiers

PMID40715154
PMCPMC12297518

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.