ArticleNature communications2025
Triple-effect correction for Cell Painting data with contrastive and domain-adversarial learning.
Article in Nature communications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Progress and new challenges in image-based profiling.Molecular systems biology · 2026Review
- Large scale compound selection guided by cell painting reveals activity cliffs and functional relationships.Communications biology · 2026Article
- Triple-effect correction for Cell Painting data with contrastive and domain-adversarial learning.Nature communications · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cell Painting (CP), as a high-throughput imaging technology, generates extensive cell-stained imaging data, providing unique morphological insights for biological research. However, CP data contains three types of technical effects, referred to as triple effects, including batch effects, gradient-influenced row and column effects (well-position effects). The interaction of various technical effects can obscure true biological signals and complicate the characterization of CP data, making correction essential for reliable analysis. Here, we propose cpDistiller, a triple-effect correction method specially designed for CP data, which leverages a pre-trained segmentation model coupled with a semi-supervised Gaussian mixture variational autoencoder utilizing contrastive and domain-adversarial learning. Through extensive qualitative and quantitative experiments across various CP profiles, we demonstrate that cpDistiller effectively corrects triple effects, especially well-position effects, while preserving cellular heterogeneity. Moreover, cpDistiller effectively captures system-level phenotypic responses to genetic perturbations and reliably infers gene functions and interactions both when combined with scRNA-seq data and independently. cpDistiller also demonstrates promising capability for identifying gene and compound targets, highlighting its potential utility in drug discovery and broader biological research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.