Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40715043›Full record

ArticleNature communications2025

Northern peatland microbial communities exhibit resistance to warming and acquire electron acceptors from soil organic matter.

Katherine Duchesneau, Borja Aldeguer-Riquelme, Caitlin Petro, Ghiwa Makke, Madison Green, Malak Tfaily, Rachel Wilson, Spencer W Roth, Eric R Johnston, Laurel A Kluber and 11 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors.

Katherine Duchesneau *School of Biological Sciences and School of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences, Center for Microbial Dynamics and Infection, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Borja Aldeguer-Riquelme *School of Civil & Environmental Engineering and School of Biological Sciences, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4266-0712
Caitlin PetroSchool of Biological Sciences and School of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences, Center for Microbial Dynamics and Infection, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Ghiwa MakkeDepartment of Environmental Science, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0004-3030-8927
Madison GreenSchool of Biological Sciences and School of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences, Center for Microbial Dynamics and Infection, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Malak TfailyDepartment of Environmental Science, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3036-2833
Rachel WilsonDepartment of Earth, Ocean and Atmospheric Science, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL, USA.
Spencer W RothBiosciences Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN, USA.
Eric R JohnstonEnvironmental Sciences Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN, USA.
Laurel A KluberEnvironmental Sciences Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9302-9413
Christopher W SchadtEnvironmental Sciences Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8759-2448
Jesse B TrejoBiological Sciences Division, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, US Department of Energy, Richland, WA, USA.
Stephen J CallisterBiological Sciences Division, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, US Department of Energy, Richland, WA, USA.
Samuel O PurvineEnvironmental Molecular Sciences Laboratory, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, US Department of Energy, Richland, WA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2257-2400
Jeffrey P ChantonDepartment of Earth, Ocean and Atmospheric Science, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3303-9708
Paul J HansonEnvironmental Sciences Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7293-3561
Susannah TringeDOE Joint Genome Institute, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6479-8427
Emiley Eloe-FadroshDOE Joint Genome Institute, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8162-1276
Tijana Glavina Del RioDOE Joint Genome Institute, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA, USA.
Konstantinos T KonstantinidisSchool of Civil & Environmental Engineering and School of Biological Sciences, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Joel E KostkaSchool of Biological Sciences and School of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences, Center for Microbial Dynamics and Infection, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, USA. joel.kostka@biology.gatech.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3051-1330

Funding

U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) DE-AC05-76RL01830U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) DE-SC0012088U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) DE-SC0023297
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The response of microbial communities that regulate belowground carbon turnover to climate change drivers in peatlands is poorly understood. Here, we leverage a whole ecosystem warming experiment to elucidate the key processes of terminal carbon decomposition and community responses to temperature rise. Our dataset of 697 metagenome-assembled genomes (MAGs) represents the microbial community from the surface (10 cm) to 2 m deep into the peat column, with only 3.7% of genomes overlapping with other well-studied peatlands. Community composition has yet to show a significant response to warming after 3 years, suggesting that metabolically diverse soil microbial communities are resistant to climate change. Surprisingly, abundant and active methanogens in the genus Candidatus Methanoflorens, Methanobacterium, and Methanoregula show the potential for both acetoclastic and hydrogenotrophic methanogenesis. Nonetheless, the predominant pathways for anaerobic carbon decomposition include sulfate/sulfite reduction, denitrification, and acetogenesis, rather than methanogenesis based on gene abundances. Multi-omics data suggest that organic matter cleavage provides terminal electron acceptors, which together with methanogen metabolic flexibility, may explain peat microbiome composition resistance to warming.

Indexed as

MicrobiotaSoilSoil MicrobiologyBacteriaCarbonClimate ChangeEcosystemElectronsGlobal WarmingMetagenomeMethaneCarbonMethaneSoil

Identifiers

PMID40715043
PMCPMC12296737

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.