ArticleEquine veterinary journal2026
Drivers of decision making in pain diagnosis and treatment: Findings from an ethnographic study of veterinary practice.
Article in Equine veterinary journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Owners' everyday interactions with their horse: Pain-related issues and those of veterinary concern.Animal welfare (South Mimms, England) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundPoor pain management in horses is a welfare concern. The 'diagnosis' of pain cannot be separated from the broader set of interactions through which it emerges. The interactions that take place during veterinary consultations shape the ways in which, or whether, pain management is discussed.
objectivesTo understand owners' and veterinarians' decision making in relation to chronic pain and its management. STUDY
designQualitative ethnographic study.
methodsData were collected from four veterinary practices in Great Britain between May 2023 and April 2024. Around 200 h of ethnographic observation was undertaken, including the observation of 47 consultations. Additionally, semi-structured interviews with 18 veterinarians and 25 owners/carers were conducted. Principles of grounded theory were drawn upon throughout the collection and analysis of data.
resultsThis study focusses on the veterinary consultation, discussing how the interplay of actors-both human and nonhuman-affected pain diagnosis and treatment decision making. There were four key processes that were common across the consultations observed: 'Establishing the presence of painful issues', 'Searching for the cause', 'The (de)escalation of issues of concern' and 'Targeting the source of pain'. In each consultation, dynamic multi-actor interactions coproduced matters of concern, and these were the 'things' to which peoples' perceptions of pain were related. Pain diagnosis was not a 'matter of fact', but emerged through relational practices. Consultations could move towards a focus on the horse's management, however, other matters of concern could obfuscate discussions about the subjective experience of the horse. MAIN LIMITATIONS: Focus on leisure horse population.
conclusionsPain could become a matter of veterinary concern if it emerged through unique contexts and practices. The nature of presentation to the veterinarian as well as the (re)construction of issues affecting the horse through veterinary medical practices could create tensions for pain management. Opportunities to improve practice are highlighted.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.