ArticleDevelopmental medicine and child neurology2026
Neurological diagnoses in children potentially fulfilling the criteria for developmental coordination disorder.
Article in Developmental medicine and child neurology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Neurological diagnoses in children suspected of developmental coordination disorder: DCD or not DCD, that is the question.Developmental medicine and child neurology · 2026Article
- Neurological diagnoses in children potentially fulfilling the criteria for developmental coordination disorder.Developmental medicine and child neurology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
aimTo investigate whether initial neurological phenotypical assessment can predict the diagnostic outcome in children potentially fulfilling the criteria for developmental coordination disorder (DCD).
methodIn this cohort study, we retrospectively investigated the medical records of 50 children potentially fulfilling the DCD criteria, referred to the Pediatric Neurology Outpatient Clinic of the University Medical Center Groningen, the Netherlands, between 2016 and 2022. On the basis of the reported diagnosis after diagnostic evaluation, the included children were retrospectively assigned either to a DCD or an alternative diagnosis group. We calculated predictive values on the basis of the initially suspected and finally reported diagnosis. We statistically compared clinical and diagnostic parameters (n = 51) between the DCD and alternative diagnosis groups.
resultsSixty-two per cent of patients received a diagnosis of DCD (n = 31 out of 50) and 38% of the patients received an alternative diagnosis (n = 19 out of 50). An underlying genetic aetiology was exposed in 58% of patients with alternative diagnoses (n = 11 out of 19). The positive predictive value for DCD was 52% and for alternative diagnoses 21%. There were no statistically distinguishing parameters between both groups.
interpretationIn children potentially fulfilling the DCD criteria, initial neurological phenotypical assessment is insufficiently predictive of the diagnostic outcome. With the perspective of lacking distinctive features between DCD and alternative diagnoses and the high prevalence of underlying genetic mutations, additional neurogenetic assessment is recommended.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.