Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40714946›Full record

ArticleJournal of forensic sciences2025

Differentiating homicidal, suicidal, and autoerotic neck compression deaths.

Scotia P Mullin, Rita Hardiman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of forensic sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Scotia P MullinMelbourne Dental School, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry, and Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Rita HardimanMelbourne Dental School, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry, and Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.

Funding

Australian Research Training ProgramThe Brian and Ann Dooley TrustThe University of Melbourne, Melbourne Dental School
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neck compression occurs when a mechanical force is applied to the anterior or anterolateral aspect of the neck. This can occur in various circumstances, including homicide, suicide, and autoerotic accidents. While forensic medical specialties effectively determine the cause of death in such cases, establishing the manner of death remains challenging. Previous research has highlighted a need for differentiation that goes beyond contextual information and autopsy findings. This study employs epidemiological methods to examine injury prevalence and statistical differentiation of neck compression deaths, aiming to quantify the likelihood of injury across various homicidal, suicidal, and accidental neck compression scenarios. Using data from 266 cases across homicidal ligature and manual strangulation, suicidal neck compression, and autoerotic neck compression, the study investigates injury and associated findings, prevalence, patterns, and probabilities across anatomical regions commonly injured due to neck compression. Results indicate that the odds of injury to various regions of the head and neck are influenced by the manner of death, with homicidal intent often presenting a higher prevalence of injury as well as increased odds of injury. Such statistical differentiation could assist in determining the manner of death in cases of masked homicide, when remains are alternatively preserved, or where there are no reliable witnesses. This research highlights the role of epidemiology in complementing forensic medical specialties, offering quantifiable evidence to assist in medico-legal investigations and expert testimony.

Indexed as

Neck InjuriesAccidentsAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAsphyxiaAustraliaCause of DeathDiagnosis, DifferentialFemaleForensic MedicineHomicideHumansMaleMiddle Agedasphyxiaautoeroticdeath investigationhanginghomicideneck compressionstrangulation

Identifiers

PMID40714946
PMCPMC12584127

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.