ArticleJournal of forensic sciences2025
Differentiating homicidal, suicidal, and autoerotic neck compression deaths.
Article in Journal of forensic sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Diagnostic value of external and internal neck findings in fatal strangulation: a scoping review of the forensic pathology literature.Forensic science, medicine, and pathology · 2026Review
- Structuring medico-legal autopsy data for public health surveillance using the 11th Revision of the International Classification of Diseases: a retrospective cohort study.European journal of public health · 2026Article
- Differentiating homicidal, suicidal, and autoerotic neck compression deaths.Journal of forensic sciences · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Neck compression occurs when a mechanical force is applied to the anterior or anterolateral aspect of the neck. This can occur in various circumstances, including homicide, suicide, and autoerotic accidents. While forensic medical specialties effectively determine the cause of death in such cases, establishing the manner of death remains challenging. Previous research has highlighted a need for differentiation that goes beyond contextual information and autopsy findings. This study employs epidemiological methods to examine injury prevalence and statistical differentiation of neck compression deaths, aiming to quantify the likelihood of injury across various homicidal, suicidal, and accidental neck compression scenarios. Using data from 266 cases across homicidal ligature and manual strangulation, suicidal neck compression, and autoerotic neck compression, the study investigates injury and associated findings, prevalence, patterns, and probabilities across anatomical regions commonly injured due to neck compression. Results indicate that the odds of injury to various regions of the head and neck are influenced by the manner of death, with homicidal intent often presenting a higher prevalence of injury as well as increased odds of injury. Such statistical differentiation could assist in determining the manner of death in cases of masked homicide, when remains are alternatively preserved, or where there are no reliable witnesses. This research highlights the role of epidemiology in complementing forensic medical specialties, offering quantifiable evidence to assist in medico-legal investigations and expert testimony.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.