Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40714797›Full record

ReviewToxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology2025

Comparative review of human health reference values of the United States.

George M Woodall, Sarah E Kobylewski-Saucier, Rachel M Shaffer, April M Luke, Laura M Carlson

Abstract readReviewComparative Study
In one paragraph

Review in Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

George M WoodallCenter for Public Health and Environmental Assessment, United States Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-0157-7509
Sarah E Kobylewski-SaucierCSS, Inc, Fairfax, VA 22030, United States.ORCID 0009-0007-4381-0512
Rachel M ShafferCenter for Public Health and Environmental Assessment, United States Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC 20460, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-2917-7865
April M LukeOffice of Land and Emergency Management, United States Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC 20460, United States.ORCID 0009-0001-8583-2185
Laura M CarlsonCenter for Public Health and Environmental Assessment, United States Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-3819-2952

Funding

Decontamination Analytical and Technical Services II EP-W-06-089EPA 68HERH20D0003Intramural EPA EPA999999Student Service Contractors
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Human health reference values (HHRVs) developed by US governmental agencies and professional organizations are derived for specific purposes related to their organizational or statutory mandates, and for individual chemicals or substance groups (e.g. manganese compounds). Choosing an appropriate chemical-specific value should be based on the risk assessment need and the specific exposure context, along with a basic understanding of the various types and the intended purposes of each available HHRV. In this overview, HHRVs have been broadly organized into 3 main categories: values for the general public, occupational exposure limits, and emergency response values. The goal of this overview is to equip the reader with a greater understanding of HHRVs, how they are meant to be applied, and key aspects to consider in selecting the most appropriate value. These key aspects include target population (e.g. general public of all ages vs. working-age adults), duration and frequency of exposure, health effect severity, confidence in the data set, use of well-documented and contemporary derivation methods, transparency and documentation of the value derivation, and the thoroughness of the review process. Chemical- and exposure scenario-specific needs should determine which HHRV is most appropriate; however, a most appropriate HHRV may not be available for every chemical and situation. Therefore, we present both considerations and limitations to guide the selection of an alternate HHRV based on suitability for the assessment scenario from among the available chemical-specific values.

Indexed as

Environmental ExposureHumansOccupational ExposureReference ValuesRisk AssessmentUnited Statesbenchmark valueemergency response valueshuman health reference valueoccupational exposure limitspublic health valuesrisk assessmenttoxicity value

Identifiers

PMID40714797
PMCPMC12533516

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.