Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40714621›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in microbiology2025

Strategies and mechanisms of contact-dependent predation in bacteria.

Coralie Tesseur, Yoann G Santin, Géraldine Laloux

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in microbiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Coralie Tesseurde Duve Institute, UCLouvain, Brussels, Belgium.
Yoann G Santinde Duve Institute, UCLouvain, Brussels, Belgium.
Géraldine Lalouxde Duve Institute, UCLouvain, Brussels, Belgium; WEL Research Institute, Wavre, Belgium. Electronic address: geraldine.laloux@uclouvain.be.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Predatory bacteria kill other bacteria to acquire nutrients. Among diverse strategies to kill and feed on prey, contact-dependent predation stands out as it requires direct physical interaction between predator and prey. By delving into the mechanisms of contact-dependent predation among bacteria, this review illustrates the breadth of molecular and cellular determinants underlying these remarkable antagonistic interactions. We highlight structural, genetic, and imaging evidence supporting the roles of envelope protein machineries - pili and secretion systems - as well as adhesins and specialised membrane junctions, in mediating key steps of contact-dependent predation. Although detailed mechanistic understanding remains scarce, recurring themes reveal the repurposing of molecular devices that may undergo precise regulation to achieve predatory actions at the right place and time. Future research should identify the molecular nature of prey-predator interfaces and uncover how prey contact and consumption integrate with other cellular processes, potentially revealing novel bacterial cell cycle control pathways.

Indexed as

BacteriaBacterial Physiological PhenomenaBacterial AdhesionBacterial ProteinsFimbriae, BacterialBacterial Proteins

Identifiers

PMID40714621
PMCPMC12428579

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.