ReviewThe lancet. Gastroenterology & hepatology2025
Patient and public health perspectives to inform expansion of hepatitis B treatment guidelines.
Review in The lancet. Gastroenterology & hepatology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- MNS induces antiviral protection and suppresses inflammation.Annals of medicine · 2026Article
- Clinical burden, disease progression, and management strategies in chronic hepatitis B: implications for public health practice.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Hepatitis B viral DNA integration occurs within three days of infection and is enhanced by ATR inhibition.Tumour virus research · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Chronic hepatitis B is associated with considerable morbidity and mortality worldwide. People living with hepatitis B face physical, emotional, social, and professional impacts, reducing their quality of life. Treatment with nucleoside or nucleotide analogues reduces the risk of liver cirrhosis and liver cancer and improves quality of life. However, few people globally are offered and can access affordable and long-term antiviral treatment. Moreover, little progress has been made towards meeting WHO hepatitis B elimination targets. The global landscape has been shifting towards expanding treatment criteria, but discussion surrounding patient and community perspectives has been inadequate. We should view treatment eligibility for hepatitis B virus infection from a public health and patient-centred approach. Here, we discuss the potential benefits and risks of expansion, implementation considerations, public health questions, and data needs surrounding the expansion of treatment eligibility. We conclude that there is a strong public health and community rationale for expanding treatment eligibility for people living with chronic hepatitis B.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.