Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40713937›Full record

ArticleJournal of intellectual disability research : JIDR2025

Ten-Year Outcomes of Anticholinergic Use Among Older Adults With Intellectual Disability: Findings From the Intellectual Disability Supplement to the Irish Longitudinal Study on Ageing (IDS-TILDA).

Lamya Al Shuhaimi, Ian D Maidment, Martin C Henman, Phyo K Myint, Juliette O'Connell, Caitríona Ryan, Philip McCallion, Mary McCarron, Maire O'Dwyer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of intellectual disability research : JIDR, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Lamya Al ShuhaimiSchool of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.ORCID 0000-0002-7142-7816
Ian D MaidmentSchool of Life and Health Sciences, Aston University, Birmingham, UK.
Martin C HenmanSchool of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.
Phyo K MyintAgeing Clinical & Experimental Research (ACER) Group, Institute of Applied Health Sciences, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK.
Juliette O'ConnellSchool of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.
Caitríona RyanTrinity Centre for Ageing and Intellectual Disability, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.
Philip McCallionSchool of Social Work, Temple University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5129-6399
Mary McCarronTrinity Centre for Ageing and Intellectual Disability, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.
Maire O'DwyerSchool of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.

Funding

Health Research Board and the Department of Health in Dublin, Ireland IDS-TILDA-2018-1Trinity College Dublin
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPeople with intellectual disability are frequently exposed to medication with anticholinergic activity. In the general population, the long-term exposure to anticholinergics has been associated with declines in both physical and cognitive function. This study aimed to examine anticholinergic exposure longitudinally in a cohort of older adults with intellectual disability (aged 40 years or over).

methodThe study examined individuals with intellectual disability aged 40 and over, who participated at two time points (Waves 1 and 4), 10 years apart, in the Intellectual Disability Supplement to the Irish Longitudinal Study on Ageing (IDS-TILDA). The Anticholinergic Cognitive Burden (ACB) scale was used to quantify anticholinergic exposure. Logistic regression analysis was employed to examine the adverse outcomes reported at time point 2 in relation to ACB scores at time point 1. Models were adjusted for age, gender, level of intellectual disability, residence, epilepsy and polypharmacy.

resultsThe study included 487 participants who provided medication data at both time points. Anticholinergic exposure remained consistent over the studied period, with approximately 30% having no exposure, 40% having mild exposure (ACB = 1-4) and 30% having high exposure (ACB = 5+). Antipsychotic medications contributed the most to the total score at both time points (Wave 1 = 35%, Wave 4 = 37%), with other anticholinergics, antiepileptics and antidepressant medications contributing 10%-16% each. Mild and high ACB scores at time point 1 were significantly associated with a higher risk of falls (odds ratio [OR] = 1.86, 95% CI: 1.03-3.38) and mental health conditions (ACB 1-4; OR = 6.60, 95% CI: 3.69-11.77; ACB 5+, OR = 17.38, 95% CI: 8.97-33.61) and lower OR for reporting dementia/Alzheimer's disease (ACB 1-4; OR = 0.39, 95% CI: 0.15-0.97; ACB 5+; OR = 0.21, 95% CI: 0.07-0.64).

conclusionOlder adults with intellectual disability are exposed to high anticholinergic burden at the two time points, 10 years apart. Being exposed to anticholinergics at Wave 1 is significantly associated with a higher risk of falls and reporting mental health conditions at Wave 4. A review of antipsychotic prescribing practice is urgently needed to reduce the anticholinergic exposure and its adverse outcomes among older adults with intellectual disability.

Indexed as

Cholinergic AntagonistsCognitive DysfunctionIntellectual DisabilityAdultAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansIrelandLongitudinal StudiesMaleMiddle AgedCholinergic Antagonistschallenging behaviourcognitive behaviourintellectual disabilitymental health

Identifiers

PMID40713937
PMCPMC12576370

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.