ArticleThe British journal of dermatology2025
Merkel cell carcinoma in solid organ transplant recipients: prognosis and response to immunotherapy.
Article in The British journal of dermatology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Skin Cancer in Solid Organ Transplant Recipients: A Review.American journal of clinical dermatology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundMerkel cell carcinoma (MCC) is an aggressive skin cancer with an increased risk of occurrence in immunocompromised patients, including solid organ transplant recipients (SOTRs). As the number of SOTRs rises worldwide, MCC cases in this population are also expected to increase. While anti-programmed cell death 1 ligand 1 (anti-PD-L1; also known as anti-programmed death ligand 1) immunotherapy generates durable tumour responses in ∼50% of immunocompetent (IC) patients with advanced MCC, its efficacy and safety in SOTRs remain uncertain as these patients have been excluded from most clinical trials.
objectivesTo compare baseline characteristics and outcomes among SOTRs and IC patients with MCC, and to evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of anti-PD-L1 in SOTRs.
methodsWe queried an MCC registry from our institution (April 1988-May 2024), extracting data on demographics, anti-PD-L1 response and immunosuppression regimens, along with incidence of allograft rejection and failure, for analysis.
resultsWe identified 1214 patients with MCC (37 SOTRs and 1177 IC patients); 8 of 37 SOTRs received anti-PD-L1. Median time from SOT to MCC diagnosis was 10 years (range 0.4-43). The proportion of patients with advanced MCC (≥ stage III) was 76% in SOTRs compared with 51% in IC patients (P = 0.004). SOTR status was associated with worse outcomes, including higher rates of disease progression [adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) 2.3], MCC-specific mortality (aHR 3.0) and overall mortality (aHR 3.9) (all P < 0.001 for the respective comparisons). Median time to death due to MCC for SOTRs was 2.7 years; 24% of SOTRs died within one year of diagnosis, in contrast with just 4% of IC patients. Median time to MCC progression for SOTRs was 8.6 months vs. 12 years for IC patients. Among SOTRs, 70% developed distant metastases within 2 years vs. 25% of IC patients. All eight MCC SOTRs treated with anti-PD-L1 were kidney transplant recipients, with five (63%) experiencing an objective response (two complete response, three partial response). However, two patients (29%) experienced irreversible graft failure within 9 weeks.
conclusionsSOTR status is a significant independent risk factor of a worse prognosis for MCC. This study represents the largest cohort evaluating the efficacy and safety of anti-PD-L1 in SOTRs with advanced MCC, highlighting the potential benefits in this population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.