ArticleBMC research notes2025
Outcome analysis after cephalomedullary nail implantation in older adults and elderly patients with per-, sub- or intertrochanteric femur fractures.
Article in BMC research notes, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Biomechanical advantages of double-column bridging plate-augmented PFNA for complex subtrochanteric femoral fractures: a finite element analysis.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2026Article
- Retrospective study of mechanical complications after cephalomedullary nail implantation from 2019 to 2024 following per-, sub- or intertrochanteric femur fractures.Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery · 2026Article
- Occult femoral neck fractures in ipsilateral femoral shaft and patellar fractures: A case series about diagnostic challenges and proposed strategies.Trauma case reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivePer-, sub-, and intertrochanteric femur fractures are common in older adults and elderly patients. They frequently lead to functional decline and increased dependency. Despite the routine use of cephalomedullary nails (CMN) for stabilization, detailed data on perioperative outcomes in this vulnerable population are scarce.
resultsIn this retrospective study, we analyzed 401 patients aged ≥ 50 years who underwent CMN fixation for per-, sub-, or intertrochanteric femur fractures at a university medical center between 2019 and 2024. Pre-, intra-, and postoperative parameters, including demographics, fracture classification, comorbidities, and functional outcomes, were extracted from hospital records and analyzed descriptively. The median patient age was 84 years (IQR 75-89) and 62.6% were female. Most fractures were classified as AO/OTA type A2 (49.9%). Prior to the fracture, 51.6% of patients were fully mobile without aids, yet only 1% maintained this mobility at discharge. The median length of stay was 12 days (IQR 7-18). In-hospital mortality was 8.4%. Postoperatively, hemoglobin and hematocrit levels declined. Discharge destinations included home (36.5%), nursing homes (19.2%), and rehabilitation facilities (12.2%).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.