ReviewJournal of eating disorders2025
Impact of body-positive social media content on body image perception.
Review in Journal of eating disorders, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Interventions That Use Highly Visual Social Media Platforms to Tackle Unhealthy Body Image in Adolescents and Young Adults: Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials and Quasi-Experimental Studies.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Pooled it
- Clinical and Psychological Impacts of Social Media and Filtered Self-Images on Body Image Perception and Patient Satisfaction Following Aesthetic Procedures Among Jordanian Women: A Cross Sectional Study.Aesthetic plastic surgery · 2026Article
- Beyond the hashtag: a content analysis of #womenshealth posts on Instagram.Health promotion international · 2026Article
- Understanding eating disorders in French undergraduate students: gender gaps, lifestyle factors, and barriers to care.Eating and weight disorders : EWD · 2026Article
- Unpacking the indirect association between problematic short-form video use and appearance anxiety.Journal of eating disorders · 2026Article
- Brief Mindfulness Meditation Protects Chinese Young Women's Body Image from Appearance-Focused Social Media Exposure: An Online Randomized Controlled Trial.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Body image and self-attractiveness in a relationship during the menopausal transition: associations with digital media and perceived media influence.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Gender differences in gaze patterns to Instagram influencer body parts: predicted by subjective body image perception and negative affect.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
- Dermorexia (Cosmeticorexia): A Narrative Review of the Emerging Phenomenon of Obsessive Skincare Behavior in the Digital Age.Aesthetic surgery journal. Open forum · 2026Article
- Eating attitudes across body mass index categories in Saudi Arabia: a cross-sectional study.Frontiers in nutrition · 2026Article
- The relationship between satisfaction with body image and resilience in burn patients: a cross-sectional study in Iran.BMC psychology · 2025Article
- Digital culture and aesthetic orientation: associations with body perception and beauty perception on social media.BMC psychology · 2025Article
- Social Appearance Anxiety and Life Satisfaction in Emerging Adults: a Moderated Mediation Model of Loneliness and Communication Skills.The Psychiatric quarterly · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionSocial media significantly impacts body image perception, particularly on visually driven platforms that propagate idealized, edited images. These platforms reinforce unrealistic beauty standards, contributing to body dissatisfaction and mental health issues such as anxiety and eating disorders. Movements like body positivity advocate for diverse body acceptance and challenge these ideals, yet questions remain about its long-term efficacy in reshaping body image perceptions and promoting psychological wellness.
methodsA systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted following PRISMA guidelines, analyzing studies published until 2024 across PubMed, Scopus, ScienceDirect, and Web of Science. Fifty-six studies examining the effects of body-positive content on social media were reviewed, including experimental and observational designs addressing short- and long-term impacts. Nineteen studies were excluded from the meta-analysis due to unsuitable data or lack of control groups. Meta-analyses of effect sizes between experimental and control groups were performed using R software.
resultsThe meta-analysis found that body-positive content improves body satisfaction and emotional well-being immediately, especially when highlighting diverse representations and self-acceptance. Longitudinal studies reported sustained improvements in body satisfaction with consistent exposure. Significant gains in body appreciation as a trait were observed, while state-based measures showed no significant effects. Variables like body dissatisfaction and functionality also lacked significant changes. Although body-positive content reduces some harmful effects of conventional beauty standards, its influence on body surveillance and social comparison remains limited. Study variability underscores the need for targeted approaches to optimize its impact on diverse populations. DISCUSSION: Body-positive social media content shows promise in improving body satisfaction, appreciation, and mood in the short term. However, further research is required to clarify its long-term effects, develop standardized assessment methods, and identify the most effective strategies for diverse demographic groups. This research is vital to fostering healthier, more inclusive body image perceptions in the digital age.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.