Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40713834›Full record

ArticleTrials2025

Bringing optimised COVID-19 vaccine schedules to immunocompromised populations: statistical elements and design.

Michael Dymock, James H McMahon, David Griffin, Michelle Hagenauer, Tom L Snelling, Julie A Marsh, On behalf of the BOOST-IC Investigator Team

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in Trials, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05556720 (Bringing Optimised COVID-19 Vaccine Schedules To ImmunoCompromised Populations), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05556720 phase3active not recruitingnot on this map

Bringing Optimised COVID-19 Vaccine Schedules To ImmunoCompromised Populations (BOOST-IC): an Adaptive Randomised Controlled Clinical Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorMonash UniversityRan2022 to 2026Enrolled960ConditionsHIV, Organ Transplantation, Lymphoma, Non-Hodgkin, Chronic Lymphocytic LeukemiaArmsPfizer Bivalent COVID-19 Vaccine, Moderna Bivalent mRNA vaccine
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Michael DymockWesfarmers Centre of Vaccines and Infectious Diseases, The Kids Research Institute Australia, 15 Hospital Avenue, Nedlands, 6009, Perth, Australia. michael.dymock@thekids.org.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4881-2860
James H McMahonDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Alfred Hospital, 85 Commercial Road, 3004, Melbourne, Australia.
David GriffinDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Alfred Hospital, 85 Commercial Road, 3004, Melbourne, Australia.
Michelle HagenauerDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Alfred Hospital, 85 Commercial Road, 3004, Melbourne, Australia.
Tom L SnellingSydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Camperdown, 2006, Sydney, Australia.
Julie A MarshWesfarmers Centre of Vaccines and Infectious Diseases, The Kids Research Institute Australia, 15 Hospital Avenue, Nedlands, 6009, Perth, Australia.
On behalf of the BOOST-IC Investigator Team

Funding

Medical Research Future Fund MRF2014921
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bringing optimised coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccine schedules to immunocompromised populations (BOOST-IC) is a multi-site, adaptive platform trial designed to assess the effect of different booster vaccination schedules in the Australian immunocompromised population on the immunogenicity, safety and cross-protection against COVID-19 caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) and its variants. Participants from one of three immunocompromised subpopulations (people living with human immunodeficiency virus, solid organ transplants or haematological malignancies) are randomised to receive a one- or two-dose booster vaccination schedule using one of three COVID-19 vaccine brands (Pfizer, Moderna or Novavax) available in Australia. The primary endpoint is the SARS-CoV-2 anti-spike immunoglobulin G concentration at 28 days after the final dose of study vaccine and is modelled using a Bayesian hierarchical two-part model, anticipating that a significant proportion of responses may be below the limit of assay detection. We describe the structure and objectives of the BOOST-IC trial and how these are mathematically represented, modelled and reported, including specification of the estimands, statistical models and decision criteria for trial adaptations. This paper should be read in conjunction with the BOOST-IC study protocol. BOOST-IC was registered on 27 September 2022 with the Australian and New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry NCT05556720.

Indexed as

COVID-19COVID-19 VaccinesImmunization ScheduleImmunocompromised HostSARS-CoV-2Adaptive Clinical Trials as TopicAustraliaBayes TheoremHumansImmunization, SecondaryImmunogenicity, VaccineMulticenter Studies as TopicRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicCOVID-19 VaccinesAdaptive trialBayesianCOVID-19ImmunocompromisedImmunogenicityStatistical modelVaccine

Identifiers

PMID40713834
PMCPMC12291272

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.