Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40713791›Full record

ReviewJournal of nanobiotechnology2025

Advanced therapeutic scaffolds of biomimetic periosteum for functional bone regeneration.

Archita Gupta, Kyung Wook Kim, Amal George Kurian, Shreyas Kumar Jain, Suparna Bhattacharya, Rajendra K Singh, Hae-Won Kim

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of nanobiotechnology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Guiding of Cell Migration over Sloped Steps Using TiOJournal of functional biomaterials · 2026
    Article
  4. Chondrogenic Potential of Periosteum-Derived Cells.Transfusion medicine and hemotherapy : offizielles Organ der Deutschen Gesellschaft fur Transfusionsmedizin und Immunhamatologie · 2026
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Archita Gupta *Institute of Tissue Regeneration Engineering (ITREN), Dankook University, Cheonan, 31116, Republic of Korea.
Kyung Wook Kim *Institute of Tissue Regeneration Engineering (ITREN), Dankook University, Cheonan, 31116, Republic of Korea.
Amal George Kurian *Institute of Tissue Regeneration Engineering (ITREN), Dankook University, Cheonan, 31116, Republic of Korea.
Shreyas Kumar JainInstitute of Tissue Regeneration Engineering (ITREN), Dankook University, Cheonan, 31116, Republic of Korea.
Suparna BhattacharyaInstitute of Tissue Regeneration Engineering (ITREN), Dankook University, Cheonan, 31116, Republic of Korea.
Rajendra K SinghInstitute of Tissue Regeneration Engineering (ITREN), Dankook University, Cheonan, 31116, Republic of Korea. singhiitgphd@gmail.com.
Hae-Won KimInstitute of Tissue Regeneration Engineering (ITREN), Dankook University, Cheonan, 31116, Republic of Korea. kimhw@dku.edu.

Funding

National Research Foundation of Korea 2021R1A5A2022318National Research Foundation of Korea RS-2023-00220408National Research Foundation of Korea RS-2023-00247485
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Treating chronic bone injuries and defects remains a significant challenge in orthopedic medicine, impacting patient mobility, recovery time, and healthcare costs. The periosteum, a specialized, vascularized connective tissue covering the outer bone surface, plays a crucial role in osteogenesis and skeletal repair. While regenerating the periosteum is critical to restoring bone structure and function, current treatments face substantial limitations, including limited donor tissue availability, donor site complications, and the risk of immunological rejection. Recent advances in biomaterial engineering have driven the development of therapeutic platforms specifically designed to promote periosteal regeneration. These biomaterial-based platforms mimic the biochemical and biomechanical properties of the native periosteal microenvironment. By facilitating key cellular processes involved in osteogenesis and angiogenesis, these materials enable controlled spatiotemporal delivery of bioactive molecules, ion release, modulation of reactive oxygen species (ROS), and enhancement of pro-angiogenic factors. In this review, we discuss the recent advancements in engineered biomaterials, focusing on their mechanisms of action and applications in periosteum restoration. We also provide insights into current challenges and future research directions, emphasizing the critical role of these strategies in clinical practice. The perspectives offered here aim to guide the development of targeted, effective therapies for periosteum repair, ultimately advancing functional bone regeneration.

Indexed as

Biomimetic MaterialsBone RegenerationPeriosteumTissue ScaffoldsAnimalsBiocompatible MaterialsHumansOsteogenesisTissue EngineeringBiocompatible MaterialsAngiogenesisBiomaterialBiomimeticBone regenerationPeriosteum

Identifiers

PMID40713791
PMCPMC12297785

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.