Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40713788›Full record

Trial reportRadiation oncology (London, England)2025

Early prediction of parotid glands secretory function based on ADC variations during radiotherapy for nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a phase II prospective study.

He Wang, Ming Fan, Lu Yan, Xiaoli Du, Lu Li, Xin Lai, Jun Yin, Lucia Clara Orlandini, Jing Ren, Qingping Yin and 5 more

Abstract readClinical Trial, Phase II
In one paragraph

Trial report in Radiation oncology (London, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

He WangDepartment of Oncology, Affiliated Hospital of Sichuan Nursing Vocational College, The Third People's Hospital of Sichuan Province, Chengdu, China.
Ming FanDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Sichuan Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Sichuan Cancer Hospital & Institute, Sichuan Cancer Center, Affiliated Cancer Hospital of University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China.
Lu YanDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Sichuan Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Sichuan Cancer Hospital & Institute, Sichuan Cancer Center, Affiliated Cancer Hospital of University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China.
Xiaoli DuDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Sichuan Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Sichuan Cancer Hospital & Institute, Sichuan Cancer Center, Affiliated Cancer Hospital of University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China.
Lu LiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Sichuan Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Sichuan Cancer Hospital & Institute, Sichuan Cancer Center, Affiliated Cancer Hospital of University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China.
Xin LaiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Sichuan Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Sichuan Cancer Hospital & Institute, Sichuan Cancer Center, Affiliated Cancer Hospital of University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China.
Jun YinDepartment of Oncology, Affiliated Hospital of Sichuan Nursing Vocational College, The Third People's Hospital of Sichuan Province, Chengdu, China.
Lucia Clara OrlandiniDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Sichuan Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Sichuan Cancer Hospital & Institute, Sichuan Cancer Center, Affiliated Cancer Hospital of University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China.
Jing RenDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Sichuan Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Sichuan Cancer Hospital & Institute, Sichuan Cancer Center, Affiliated Cancer Hospital of University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China.
Qingping YinDepartment of Oncology, Affiliated Hospital of Sichuan Nursing Vocational College, The Third People's Hospital of Sichuan Province, Chengdu, China.
Jiao PeiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Sichuan Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Sichuan Cancer Hospital & Institute, Sichuan Cancer Center, Affiliated Cancer Hospital of University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China.
Yazhou RenSchool of Computer Science and Engineering, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China.
Jinyi LangDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Sichuan Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Sichuan Cancer Hospital & Institute, Sichuan Cancer Center, Affiliated Cancer Hospital of University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China.
Qichao ZhouManteia Technologies Co., Ltd, Xiamen, China.
Mei FengDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Sichuan Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Sichuan Cancer Hospital & Institute, Sichuan Cancer Center, Affiliated Cancer Hospital of University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China. Freda_fm@126.com.

Funding

Chengdu Science and Technology Project 2024-YF05-02377-SNChina University-Industry-Research Innovation Fund 2023HT071Sichuan Cancer Hospital Excellent Youth Fund YB2024009Sichuan Provincial Health Commission Project 24LCYJPT09
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThis study aimed to quantify dynamic changes in the Apparent Diffusion Coefficient (ADC) values of the parotid glands during radiotherapy and explore their correlation with early-stage gland dysfunction.

methodsNasopharyngeal carcinoma patients receiving definitive chemoradiotherapy were prospectively enrolled. Magnetic Resonance Diffusion-Weighted Imaging (MR-DWI) was performed at pre-radiotherapy (pre-RT), the 5th, 15th fractions, and end of radiotherapy. ADC values and volumes for ipsilateral (IP) and contralateral parotid glands (CP) were recorded. Salivary function was assessed using scintigraphy (SGS) and the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) xerostomia criteria.

resultsA total of 80 eligible patients were analyzed. From pre-radiotherapy(pre-RT) to the end of radiotherapy, Pearson correlation analysis showed that changes in ADC values were positively correlated with the delivered dose (p < 0.01) and reduction in parotid volume (p < 0.01).From pre-RT to the 5th fraction, mean ADC values((ΔADC5) increased significantly by 17.7% (IP) and 16.3% (CP) (p < 0.01), with minimal volume changes(ΔrV5) (p = 0.060, p = 0.068). Spearman analysis revealed a positive association between the change in ΔADC5 and the incidence of xerostomia 6 months after radiotherapy (p < 0.01). Multivariable analysis identified ΔADC5 rather than ΔrV5 as an independent predictor of secretory dysfunction (IP: Odds Ratio (OR) = 1.010, p = 0.015 by SGS; OR = 1.026, p = 0.000 by RTOG; CP: OR = 1.017, p = 0.004 by SGS; OR = 1.015, p = 0.002 by RTOG).

conclusionThis study analyze the dynamic changes in parotid gland ADC values, volume, and secretion function throughout radiotherapy. Changes in ΔADC5 can predict radiation-induced parotid gland injury before significant volume changes occur, thereby enabling early intervention.

Indexed as

Diffusion Magnetic Resonance ImagingNasopharyngeal CarcinomaNasopharyngeal NeoplasmsParotid GlandXerostomiaAdultAgedChemoradiotherapyFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPrognosisProspective StudiesYoung AdultDiffusion weighted imagingNasopharyngeal carcinomaParotid glandRadiotherapyXerostomia

Identifiers

PMID40713788
PMCPMC12297774

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.