Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40713762›Full record

ArticleBMC medical education2025

Bridging early medical education and health systems improvement: a multi-faceted faculty development program to enhance engagement and impact.

Catherine Y Lau, Edgar Pierluissi, Kristin Casey Callaghan, Anna Chang, Lei Choi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical education, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Catherine Y LauDepartment of Medicine, University of California San Francisco, 521 Parnassus Avenue, #5602, CA, San Francisco, 94117, USA. Catherine.Lau2@ucsf.edu.
Edgar PierluissiUniversity of California San Francisco, San Francisco, USA.
Kristin Casey CallaghanSchool of Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, USA.
Anna ChangUniversity of California San Francisco, San Francisco, USA.
Lei ChoiUniversity of California San Francisco, San Francisco, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDespite calls to further incorporate health systems science in undergraduate medical education, the ability for early medical learners to participate in authentic, project-based learning in health systems science and improvement has been limited by the knowledge, skills, and competency of teaching faculty. This study explores the impact and outcomes of a comprehensive, longitudinal faculty development program for physician educators in health systems improvement (HSI).

methodsThe University of California, San Francisco HSI faculty development program began with a medical school curricular redesign to include a 14-month weekly course that integrates HSI experiential learning with clinical skills training for early medical students in small groups led by physician coaches. Most physician educators began the role with no formal training in HSI - a gap this program addresses through a multi-faceted approach with standardized and individualized components. We studied the efficacy of the HSI faculty development program and report outcomes using the Kirkpatrick Model, focusing on impact on physicians, students, and health systems.

resultsFrom 2016 to 2023, the HSI faculty development program reached 119 faculty across 15 departments and three health systems. For Kirkpatrick level one (satisfaction), faculty participated in at least three workshops per year, with an average rating of 4.7 (scale 1-5). Faculty satisfaction in the teaching role is 4.5 and student rating of faculty is 4.8. Each year, faculty demonstrated Kirkpatrick level two (knowledge) by designing up to 60 HSI projects for the class of incoming first year medical students (n = 165). Faculty assessed other students' projects with high concordance with curricular leader grading (> 90%). All students met expectations by course conclusion. For level three (behavior), faculty independently led 35 three-hour small group sessions yearly for a total of 1,281 early medical students over 8 years, and all student project teams completed at least one full Plan-Do-Study-Act cycle. For level four (impact), faculty and students have completed 242 HSI projects to date, each aligned with health system priority areas.

conclusionsOur study demonstrates that a longitudinal, multi-component HSI faculty development program provides physician faculty sufficient competence to effectively engage medical student-led teams in systems improvement in the clinical learning environment.

Indexed as

Education, Medical, UndergraduateFaculty, MedicalStaff DevelopmentClinical CompetenceCurriculumFemaleHumansMaleProblem-Based LearningProgram DevelopmentProgram EvaluationQuality ImprovementSan FranciscoStudents, MedicalExperiential learningFaculty developmentHealth systems scienceQuality improvementUndergraduate medical educationWorkplace learning

Identifiers

PMID40713762
PMCPMC12291519

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.