ReviewNutrition & metabolism2025
Association of dietary nitrate and nitrite from plant sources with digestive system cancer risk: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Review in Nutrition & metabolism, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Dietary Nitrate-Rich Vegetables as Natural Modulators of Health: Mechanisms and Benefits in Ageing Populations.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- A Narrative Review on Nitrate-Rich Diets as Adjuncts to Antihypertensive Therapy: Enhancing Treatment Efficacy via Oxidative Stress Modulation.Biomedicines · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundRecent studies have indicated that dietary nitrate intake from plant sources offers numerous health benefits. However, the relationships between the intake of plant-derived nitrates and nitrites and the risk of digestive system cancers (DSCs) remain unclear. This study aimed to quantify the associations between dietary nitrate and nitrite from plant sources and the risk of DSCs via a systematic review and meta-analysis.
methodsWe conducted extensive literature searches of the PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, CINAHL, Cochrane Library, CNKI, VIP, Wanfang, and CBM databases up to April 2024. STATA 14.0 was applied for meta-regression and meta-analysis, and fixed or random effects models were used to calculate the pooled relative risks and 95% confidence intervals. Sensitivity and subgroup analyses were conducted to explore sources of heterogeneity.
resultsOur analysis included 13 articles with a total of 897,585 participants, which included 10 different types of digestive tumors. The pooled results indicated no significant association between high (median: >134.9 mg/day) [RR = 0.92; 95% CI (0.82-1.03); P = 0.14] or moderate (median: 83.0-133.1 mg/day) [RR = 0.95; 95% CI (0.89-1.02); P = 0.186] nitrate intake and DSCs. Similarly, neither high (median: >0.91 mg/day) [RR = 0.91; 95% CI (0.84-1.00); P = 0.05] nor moderate (median: 0.75 mg/day) [RR = 0.96; 95% CI (0.89-1.04); P = 0.355] nitrite intake was correlated with DSCs. However, a negative association was observed between nitrate or nitrite intake and DSCs when the data were stratified by subgroup variables such as study type, sex, region, antioxidant intake, and fibre intake. A meta-regression dose‒response analysis revealed that the risk of gastric cancer was negatively associated with the median intake of plant-derived nitrates [slope= -0.0047 per mg/day; 95% CI (-0.0086--0.0008); P = 0.022].
conclusionsPlant-derived nitrate and nitrite intakes were not significantly associated with DSCs. This relationship may be affected by subgroup variables, and a dose‒response analysis indicated that higher nitrate intake was linked to a reduced risk of gastric cancer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.