ArticleJournal of ovarian research2025
Ovarian aging, cardiovascular risk and inflammation: insights from the OVA study.
Article in Journal of ovarian research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Early in, early out: reproductive lifespan timing and cardiometabolic risk in women.Journal of endocrinological investigation · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundCardiovascular disease is the leading cause of death among women and is associated with both metabolic syndrome and ovarian aging. Chronic inflammation has been proposed as a potential common underlying mechanism linking these conditions. This study aimed to examine the associations between inflammatory markers (interleukin-6, tumor necrosis factor-alpha, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein) and metabolic syndrome, with markers of ovarian aging and cardiovascular risk.
resultsIn the cross-sectional analysis of 829 women aged 25-45, no significant associations were found between inflammatory markers, metabolic syndrome, and ovarian aging measures (anti-Müllerian hormone [AMH] and antral follicle count [AFC]), except for a modest association between metabolic syndrome and AMH (mean difference 0.085; 95% CI: 0.035 to 0.134). Similarly, inflammatory markers and metabolic syndrome were not significantly associated with the Framingham Risk Score. In the longitudinal analysis of 307 participants, changes in AMH and AFC were not associated with inflammatory markers or metabolic syndrome. However, higher levels of IL-6 and TNF-α were associated with the Framingham Risk Score, whereas hsCRP and metabolic syndrome were not.
conclusionThese findings do not support the hypothesis that inflammation is a central mechanism linking ovarian aging to cardiovascular risk. The absence of consistent associations across analyses suggests that alternative pathways may underlie this relationship. Further research incorporating a broader range of biomarkers is warranted to elucidate the complex interactions between reproductive aging and cardiovascular health in women.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.