Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40713685›Full record

ArticleBMC nursing2025

Ethical principles, sensitivity, and caring behaviors among nursing students: a cross-sectional study.

Esra Danacı, Tuğba Kavalalı Erdoğan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC nursing, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Esra DanacıAhmet Erdoğan Vocational School of Health Services, Zonguldak Bülent Ecevit University, Zonguldak, 67000, Turkey. esra.danaci@beun.edu.tr.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1453-6255
Tuğba Kavalalı ErdoğanDepartment of Nursing, Health Science Faculty, Ondokuz Mayıs University, Samsun, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7903-4905

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIt is extremely important for nursing students to adopt ethical principles during their education, to recognize ethical dilemmas, to develop ethical sensitivity and compassionate care behaviors in order to prepare them for a complex and challenging working environment.

aimThis research was conducted to examine the relationship between attitudes towards ethical principles, ethical sensitivity and caring behaviors among nursing students.

designQuantitative and cross-sectional research.

methodsThe study was conducted in the nursing program of a state university in Türkiye. Data were gathered utilizing a personal information form, the Ethical Principles Attitude Scale (EPAS), the Ethical Sensitivity Questionnaire for Nursing Students (ESQ-NS), and the Caring Behaviors Assessment Tool Nursing Version-Short Form (CBAN-SF).

resultsThis study revealed that the mean EPAS score for nursing students was 143.5 ± 14.3, the mean ESQ-NS score was 39.1 ± 4.6, and the mean CBAN-SF score was 117.6 ± 13.3. A positive, moderate, and substantial connection was identified between EPAS and ESQ-NS (r = 0.443) as well as CBAN-SF (r = 0.533). Moreover, views about ethical principles were identified as predictors of ethical sensitivity and compassionate behaviors in nursing students; a one-unit increase in the EPAS score led to a 19% variation in the ESQ-NS score and a 28% variation in the CBAN-SF score.

conclusionThe study revealed that an enhancement in nursing students' attitudes towards ethical principles correlated with an improvement in their ethical sensitivity and a more positive perception of their own caring activities. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Not applicable.

Indexed as

Attitude towards ethical principlesCaring behaviorsEthical sensitivityNursing educationNursing students

Identifiers

PMID40713685
PMCPMC12291286

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.