Observational studyInternational breastfeeding journal2025
Physicians not in direct contact with breastfeeding: knowledge of the compatibility with diseases and the most prescribed drugs in their specialty.
Observational study in International breastfeeding journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe lack of breastfeeding training among physicians who indirectly attend to mothers providing this type of feeding to their babies could lead to its inadequate suspension. There are no impactful scientific publications addressing knowledge about breastfeeding among medical professionals who are not usually in contact with it, such as surgeons, nephrologists, internists, or cardiologists. The aim of this study is to evaluate the knowledge of physicians who are not directly involved in breastfeeding regarding its compatibility with drugs or diseases and related issues, as well as the available resources to consult its compatibility. The study also aims to analyze whether knowledge varies according to the center Baby Friendly Hospital Initiative (BFHI) accreditation, specialty (medical/surgical/medical-surgical), and job position (resident/attending).
methodsThis was a multicenter and cross-sectional observational study conducted in Spain, between October 2023 and February 2024. All physicians from hospitals or health centers in the country were included, resulting in 418 surveys. The questions were grouped into blocks: the first block included demographic data; the second block included general knowledge about breastfeeding; the third block included compatibility with diseases and drugs; and the fourth block included resources for consultation.
resultsAlthough 87% (365/418) of the physicians treated women who were breastfeeding at least once a year, they reported having limited training in breastfeeding, especially basic issues, and compatibility with drugs. In cases of doubt, 57% (238/418) reported seeking a reliable source. BFHI accreditation, specialty, or job position had little influence on the results. Nevertheless, we observed a higher percentage of correct responses in BFHI paediatric care centers and hospitals.
conclusionsThe results of this study highlight the lack of training in breastfeeding issues among professionals who are not in direct contact with breastfeeding women. This knowledge gap is particularly evident in basic questions about breastfeeding and its compatibility with various medications. This emphasizes the importance of investing in breastfeeding promotion and education across all clinical settings, not only among paediatricians or obstetricians, but throughout the entire healthcare system. Encouraging a multidisciplinary approach can significantly improve support for breastfeeding women and ultimately benefit maternal and infant health outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.