ArticleBMC oral health2025
Investigation and prevention of intraosseous temperature rise in guided implant surgery: an ex-vivo study.
Article in BMC oral health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Full-Arch Oral Rehabilitation in All-on-4 "M" Configuration Using Surgical Guides with Internal Cooling: A Clinical Case Report.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThis study evaluated temperature changes at implant preparation sites using a surgical guide, the effects of the cooling solution's temperature, and the impact of performing osteotomy at low speed without irrigation. The working hypothesis was that effective cooling with a low-temperature solution is essential to prevent excessive heat generation at the osteotomy site.
methodsA surgical guide was fabricated using stereolithographic technology. Temperature variations were recorded using a K-type thermocouple. On 40 sheep iliac bone specimens, four implant sites were prepared with a surgical guide as experimental groups: 2.9 mm × 8.5 mm and 2.9 mm × 13 mm representing narrow diameters, and 3.8 mm × 8.5 mm and 3.8 mm × 13 mm representing regular diameters. A 3.5 mm × 10 mm implant site prepared using the conventional method served as the control group.
resultsA statistically significant temperature increase was observed in all groups as the bur diameter increased. The temperature rise in implant sites prepared with surgical guides at high speed under irrigation was significantly higher than that observed with the conventional technique. Furthermore, the temperature elevation in the group irrigated with solution cooled to 10 °C was significantly lower than in the group irrigated with solution at 24 °C and the group subjected to low-speed drilling without irrigation.
conclusionsAppropriately applied external irrigation, tailored to patient-specific conditions, can maintain intraosseous temperatures within safe thresholds. Moreover, refraining from low-speed drilling without irrigation and employing low-temperature cooling solutions in guided surgical systems represent more reliable strategies for controlling thermal increases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.