ArticleBMC palliative care2025
Improving specialist palliative care discharges from hospitals and hospices to community settings: a qualitative interview study of the communication experiences of patients, carers, and primary care professionals.
Article in BMC palliative care, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundPatients who have received specialist intervention during periods of complex symptom and palliative care needs (e.g. pain crisis) may be discharged from specialist palliative care services to primary care. Despite such discharges being reasonably common, little is known about what happens during this process. We sought to explore patient, carer and healthcare professional experiences, identifying ways to improve this crucial and time-sensitive part of the healthcare journey.
methodsA qualitative interview study designed using an interpretive approach and reflexive thematic analysis methods. Sampling was purposive across six specialist palliative care sites (hospitals and hospices) and six general practices.
resultsA total of 38 participants took part in interviews:15 patients, 8 carers and 15 primary care professionals. Two overarching key themes were developed. The first described the multiple ways that 'discharge' was understood depending on the setting and circumstances of the patient. The second explored what was associated with better or worse transitions to primary care. Discharge communications that were accurate and complete were described as effective whereby written information reinforced verbal instructions and acted as a reminder. Participant suggestions for improving these discharge communications included: incorporating the patient's palliative care preferences (e.g. advanced directives); offering letters to patients and, where appropriate, carers; providing post-discharge follow-up and contact details; ensuring medication instructions are accessible to patients and carers.
conclusionsCurrent specialist palliative care discharge communications risk confusion, distress, and increased workload post-discharge. The study identified numerous suggestions professionals could take to improve this process.
trial registrationRegistered in ISRCTN Registry on 29.12.2023 ref: ISRCTN18098027.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.