ArticleBMC oral health2025
Effect of minimally invasive posterior veneer Preparation designs on failure load and mode after fatigue (in-vitro study).
Article in BMC oral health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCeramic veneers are a common option for enhancing dental aesthetics by improving tooth form, shade, and function. Preparation design is considered a critical factor in the success of dental veneers, as it influences the failure load and fatigue survival of posterior minimally invasive ceramic veneer restorations. The purpose of the study is to compare the failure load and mode after fatigue among three types of veneer preparation designs for restoring premolars.
methods64 human premolars were equally divided into four groups. Group 1 had a buccal preparation depth of 0.7 mm; Group 2 had an additional reduction of the buccal cusp; Group 3 had a mesio-occluso-distal box with dimensions of 2 mm wide and 3 mm deep. The remaining sound teeth served as the control group. Monolithic lithium disilicate restorations were cemented onto the prepared teeth with adhesive cement and then exposed to dynamic fatigue and thermocycling. Each specimen underwent a single load-to-failure test, and the discrepancy in failure load before and after fatigue was computed.
resultsNo significant differences in initial failure load were observed among the four groups evaluated (p <.075). A significant drop in failure load was observed in all groups after fatigue (P = 0.012). The failure loads of Groups I and II were significantly lower than those of Group III and the control (P < 0.05)." Nevertheless, after fatigue, statistically significant differences were detected (p <.013) as fatigue caused a substantial drop in failure load among all groups.
conclusionsWithin the limitations of this study, fatigue significantly reduced failure load in all groups. Veneer preparation design influenced post-fatigue strength, with more conservative designs showing better resistance. These findings underscore the impact of fatigue on structural integrity and the importance of tooth preparation design on fatigue resilience.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.