ReviewJournal of translational medicine2025
Discordant CAR-T cell signaling: implications of divergence from physiological T cell activation.
Review in Journal of translational medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Review
- CD28 co-stimulatory domain enhances efficacy of CER T cell therapy compared to 4-1BB in an ovarian cancer mouse model.Scientific reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell therapy constituted a recent breakthrough in the treatment of poor prognosis cancers by harnessing therapeutic T cells with an engineered non-MHC restricted antigen recognition transgene. CAR constructs are expressed in addition to endogenous T cell receptor (TCR) and utilize their activation machinery by a process still not yet fully understood. Despite the great success and widespread presence of CAR-T cells in clinical trials, they still have some shortcomings that may stem in part from their failure to fully mimic physiological TCR-mediated T cell activation, causing dysfunctional states and impaired responses that limit their persistence and causes incomplete remission of tumors or severe side effects. Recent studies have shown that much of the differences among CAR-T cell activation and natural TCRs occur early in the antigen recognition process, upon formation of the immune synapse when the first signaling events occur. In this review, by comparing the mechanisms of lymphocyte activation by CARs vs. TCRs, we will discuss how these chimeric constructs induce a stimulation characterized by un-orchestrated, incomplete, or impaired signaling events that in turn could explain some of their shortcomings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.