Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40713597›Full record

ArticleBMC cancer2025

Machine learning-based dynamic CEA trajectory and prognosis in gastric cancer.

Yonghe Chen, Dan Liu, Zhong Wang, Yi Lin, Xiaohan Jiang, Junjie Liu, Lei Lian

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC cancer, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Yonghe Chen *Department of General Surgery, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, 26 Yuancun Erheng Road, Guangzhou, 510655, China. chenyhe@mail2.sysu.edu.cn.
Dan Liu *Department of Laboratory Science, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou, University of Chinese Medicine, 111 Dade Road, Guangzhou, 510120, China.
Zhong Wang *School of Nursing, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, 510080, China.
Yi LinDepartment of General Surgery, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, 26 Yuancun Erheng Road, Guangzhou, 510655, China.
Xiaohan JiangSchool of Nursing, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, 510080, China.
Junjie LiuDepartment of General Surgery, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, 26 Yuancun Erheng Road, Guangzhou, 510655, China.
Lei LianDepartment of General Surgery, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, 26 Yuancun Erheng Road, Guangzhou, 510655, China. Lianlei2@mail.sysu.edu.cn.

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China 82203187Program of Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Digestive Diseases 2020B1111170004Science and Technology Projects in Guangzhou 2025A04J5296
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundStatic carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) levels are well‑established prognostic markers in patients with gastric cancer, but the significance of their dynamic trajectories over time has rarely been reported.

methodsWe analysed the perioperative CEA levels (presurgery, early postsurgery, and late postsurgery) of 578 gastric cancer patients who underwent curative resection, with a median follow-up of 29 months. We used the entire cohort for k-means clustering. Survival differences between clusters were assessed using Kaplan-Meier analysis and Cox regression.

resultsOf the 578 patients, 15.57% exhibited elevated CEA levels before surgery (median 2.07 ng/mL), which then decreased to 3.29% (median 1.74 ng/mL) after surgery. However, after six months, a slight rebound was observed (18.51% elevated, median 2.98 ng/mL). K-means clustering identified three CEA trajectories: high, medium, and low (Calinski-Harabasz index: 358). Survival analysis demonstrated that higher CEA trajectories were associated with worse disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS). With the low cluster as a reference, multivariate Cox regression analysis revealed that a higher CEA trajectory was an independent prognostic factor, with an elevated risk in the high cluster (HR 2.64, 95% CI: 1.37-5.0), indicating that the high cluster had more than twice the mortality risk of the low cluster and that the medium cluster had a moderately increased mortality risk (HR 1.69, 95% CI: 1.0-2.85).

conclusionHigher CEA trajectories are associated with a worse prognosis, highlighting the importance of enhanced monitoring for this group of patients.

Indexed as

Biomarkers, TumorCarcinoembryonic AntigenMachine LearningStomach NeoplasmsAdultAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansKaplan-Meier EstimateMaleMiddle AgedPrognosisBiomarkers, TumorCarcinoembryonic AntigenCarcinoembryonic antigenGastric cancerSurvivalTrajectory analysis

Identifiers

PMID40713597
PMCPMC12296618

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.