ArticleBMC cancer2025
Machine learning-based dynamic CEA trajectory and prognosis in gastric cancer.
Article in BMC cancer, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Survival prediction in stage II/III rectal cancer: Role of immune-inflammatory biomarkers post neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy.Oncology letters · 2026Article
- Establishment of a Gastric Cancer Diagnostic Model Based on the Combined Evaluation of Peripheral Blood Immune-inflammatory Nutritional Indicators and Tumor Markers.Journal of cancer prevention · 2026Article
- Timeliness of postoperative serum carcinoembryonic antigen monitoring for predicting recurrence after gastric cancer surgery.World journal of gastrointestinal surgery · 2026Article
- The preoperative albumin-to-carcinoembryonic antigen ratio (ACR) predicts prognosis and facilitates risk stratification in gastric cancer: a retrospective cohort study.Frontiers in nutrition · 2026Article
- LungPanelNet: a machine learning-based approach for the early prediction and differentiation of non-small cell lung cancer.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundStatic carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) levels are well‑established prognostic markers in patients with gastric cancer, but the significance of their dynamic trajectories over time has rarely been reported.
methodsWe analysed the perioperative CEA levels (presurgery, early postsurgery, and late postsurgery) of 578 gastric cancer patients who underwent curative resection, with a median follow-up of 29 months. We used the entire cohort for k-means clustering. Survival differences between clusters were assessed using Kaplan-Meier analysis and Cox regression.
resultsOf the 578 patients, 15.57% exhibited elevated CEA levels before surgery (median 2.07 ng/mL), which then decreased to 3.29% (median 1.74 ng/mL) after surgery. However, after six months, a slight rebound was observed (18.51% elevated, median 2.98 ng/mL). K-means clustering identified three CEA trajectories: high, medium, and low (Calinski-Harabasz index: 358). Survival analysis demonstrated that higher CEA trajectories were associated with worse disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS). With the low cluster as a reference, multivariate Cox regression analysis revealed that a higher CEA trajectory was an independent prognostic factor, with an elevated risk in the high cluster (HR 2.64, 95% CI: 1.37-5.0), indicating that the high cluster had more than twice the mortality risk of the low cluster and that the medium cluster had a moderately increased mortality risk (HR 1.69, 95% CI: 1.0-2.85).
conclusionHigher CEA trajectories are associated with a worse prognosis, highlighting the importance of enhanced monitoring for this group of patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.