Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40713551›Full record

Observational studyBMC cancer2025

Comparison of outcomes with elranatamab and real world treatments in the UK for triple class exposed relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma.

Carmen Tsang, Joseph E O'Reilly, Lewis Carpenter, Charles Duffield, Filipa Tunaru, Jamie Wallis, Alycia Perkins, Thomas Price, Sam Wood, Karthik Ramasamy

Abstract readComparative StudyMulticenter StudyObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in BMC cancer, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. T-Cell Engagers TargetingInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Observational
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Carmen TsangPfizer Ltd, Tadworth, Surrey, UK. carmen.tsang@pfizer.com.
Joseph E O'ReillyArcturis Data, Kidlington, Oxford, UK.
Lewis CarpenterArcturis Data, Kidlington, Oxford, UK.
Charles DuffieldPfizer Ltd, Tadworth, Surrey, UK.
Filipa TunaruArcturis Data, Kidlington, Oxford, UK.
Jamie WallisArcturis Data, Kidlington, Oxford, UK.
Alycia PerkinsArcturis Data, Kidlington, Oxford, UK.
Thomas PricePfizer Ltd, Tadworth, Surrey, UK.
Sam WoodPfizer Ltd, Tadworth, Surrey, UK.
Karthik RamasamyOxford University Hospitals Trust, Oxford, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPatients with triple class exposed (TCE), relapsed and refractory (RR) multiple myeloma (MM) have limited treatment options and poor prognosis. Elranatamab, a bispecific BCMA-targeted antibody, is an investigational treatment for RRMM with demonstrated efficacy and safety in MagnetisMM-3, a single-arm, multi-centre, phase-2 study. This study aimed to characterise outcomes for real world TCE RRMM patients and to estimate the treatment effect of elranatamab compared to treatments available in routine clinical care for TCE RRMM in the NHS.

methodsA retrospective, observational, external control arm (ECA) study combining participants from a single arm, multi-centre phase 2 study, MagnetisMM-3, receiving elranatamab to compare patient characteristics and median survival using a comparator cohort of TCE RRMM patients treated with real world regimens in five UK centres between 2015 and 2023. Both naive and adjusted treatment effect estimates for progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were obtained using inverse probability of treatment weighted (IPTW) Cox proportional hazards models and differences in restricted mean survival time (dRMST). Quantitative bias analysis was used to assess the robustness of effect estimates to unmeasured confounding.

resultsFrom a total of 5,535 patients identified with a diagnosis of MM, 81 were identified as eligible for inclusion in the ECA. A total of 13 different regimens were recorded as being initiated from the real world RRMM at index date, the most common regimen was pomalidomide + dexamethasone (48.15%). Clinical outcomes in the ECA were poor (median PFS 3.71 months [95% confidence interval (CI) 2.73-4.73], median OS 11.00 months [8.02-18.10]). In unadjusted analyses the elranatamab cohort had significant improvements in PFS (dRMST 6.95 months [4.08-9.61]) and OS (Hazard Ratio (HR) 0.66 [0.45-0.96]). Adjusted analyses showed similar effects for PFS (dRMST 6.45 [3.05-9.45]) but were equivocal for OS (HR 0.75 [0.46-1.26]).

conclusionThis study provides recent real world evidence of poor outcomes in TCE RRMM in the UK. PFS was longer among patients who received elranatamab compared with treatments for TCE RRMM in routine UK clinical practice.

Indexed as

Multiple MyelomaNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsDrug Resistance, NeoplasmFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedProgression-Free SurvivalRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeUnited KingdomExternal control armMultiple myelomaObservational studyOverall survivalProgression-Free survivalReal world dataReal world evidenceRelapsed and refractory multiple myelomaTriple-Class exposed

Identifiers

PMID40713551
PMCPMC12297639

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.