ArticleBMC cancer2025
Racial and socioeconomic disparities in surgical management and outcomes in pancreatic adenocarcinoma: a single-center experience in the last 13 years.
Article in BMC cancer, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Survival improvement and widening social disadvantage-related disparities in osteosarcoma: a Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results-based retrospective cohort study.Translational cancer research · 2026Article
- Individual and combined effects of marital status, household income, and residence on cancer management and survival in primary bone cancer: a SEER-based retrospective cohort study.Translational cancer research · 2026Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPancreatic adenocarcinoma (PaC) is an aggressive cancer with a poor prognosis. While disparities in surgical management and outcomes have been reported, most studies use outdated or population-level data, limiting their relevance in modern clinical settings. This study examined the impact of race and socioeconomic status on pancreatic resection rates and survival outcomes in PaC patients.
methodsA retrospective analysis of 525 patients diagnosed with PaC at a single institution (2010-2024) was conducted. Demographics, tumor characteristics, resection rates, and survival outcomes were assessed. Socioeconomic status was inferred from zip codes. Logistic regression and Cox proportional hazards models were used to evaluate treatment access and survival.
resultsAfrican American patients had lower resection rates than White patients (20.0% vs. 36.1%; p < 0.001), even after adjusting for resectable stages. Resection likelihood was reduced by being African American (OR 0.27; p < 0.001), older age (OR 0.97/year; p = 0.007), advanced stage (OR 0.09; p < 0.001), and lower education (OR 0.86; p = 0.003). Mean survival was shorter for African Americans than White patients (405.7 vs. 426.8 days; p < 0.001) but nonsignificant after adjustments (HR 1.19; p = 0.34).
conclusionsRacial and socioeconomic disparities persist in PaC surgical management, impacting outcomes. Addressing these inequities through improved access to care is essential for achieving more equitable treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.