ArticleBMC musculoskeletal disorders2025
Age- and sex-related changes in children with and without generalized joint hypermobility: a two-year follow-up study.
Article in BMC musculoskeletal disorders, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundJoint hypermobility provides flexibility and is known to enhance motor performance but can also give rise to musculoskeletal complaints. There is evidence that young people are more flexible than older individuals, and females are more flexible than males. However, information about age- and sex-related changes in the range of motion (ROM) over time is scarce.
methodThis study followed 126 children over two years; their ROM was measured three times with one year between measurements. The Beighton scoring system and goniometry were used to classify the children into normal mobile, mobile and hypermobile groups. The study included 56 males and 70 females. Mean age was 7.58 (6-9years), 8.58 (7-10years), and 9.60 (8-11years) years at time points 1, 2, and 3, respectively.
resultsJoint hypermobility based on a Beighton score of 7-9 decreased from 25 to 13% to 6% in the last year. This was caused by a reduction of elbow and knee movement range but not by changes in finger joints or hamstring length. The pattern of decrease was very similar for boys and girls. Four children with hypermobility showed a large increase in ROM (> 10 degrees), of which 2 showed an increase in ROM at the elbow. Of the 53 children classified with normal mobility at measurement one 15 (28.3%) had one hypermobile joint (localized joint hypermobility).
conclusionChildren between 6 and 11 years of age get less flexible over 2 years. Mobility changes with age are comparable in boys and girls. Children who are not classified as generalized hypermobile can still have localized hypermobility. An increase in joint mobility is exceptional and may be a warning sign.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.