ArticleBMC neuroscience2025
Effects of repetitive mechanical tactile stimulation interventions with stationary and moving patterns on paired-pulse depression.
Article in BMC neuroscience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundRepetitive somatosensory stimulation (RSS) reduces paired-pulse depression (PPD), reflecting GABAergic inhibition in the primary somatosensory cortex (S1). This effect may vary by tactile stimulation pattern. Therefore, this study aimed to clarify the effects of RSS intervention with stationary and moving pattern tactile stimulation on PPD.
resultsIn a crossover study of 15 healthy males, RSS with a stationary pattern showed a non-significant trend toward increased PPD (corrected p = 0.088), while the moving pattern showed no effect. A strong negative correlation was found between baseline PPD and its change rate (r = - 0.837, p < 0.001), indicating that greater baseline S1 inhibition predicted a larger reduction after RSS.
conclusionRSS effects on GABAergic inhibition in S1 depend on the tactile stimulation pattern, emphasizing the importance of tactile stimulus design in modulating somatosensory cortex activity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.