ArticleBMC emergency medicine2025
Decision-making and acute behavioural disturbance (ABD): a qualitative thematic analysis of perspectives on decision-making by UK ambulance paramedics.
Article in BMC emergency medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Competencies required when police patrol officers encounter people in suicidal crisis: a Delphi study.Health & justice · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIncidents involving severe agitation are complex emergencies which occur infrequently in the community but have high stakes for patients and responders. Acute behavioural disturbance (ABD), an umbrella term used to describe severe agitation, sometimes known as excited delirium, affects patients who typically present to police and ambulance paramedics and may require restraint. However, little is known about how paramedics make these restraint decisions. This research aimed to explore the decisions made by paramedics when managing restraint in the context of ABD in the UK ambulance setting.
methodsTen semi-structured interviews and one focus group were undertaken with one newly qualified and 12 experienced paramedics employed by a large metropolitan ambulance service. The resulting data were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis, informed by critical realism.
resultsWe identified three interrelated themes from the data: working in the context of fear, navigating complexity without consistent and adequate formal subject-specific training, and the nature of professional roles and relationships at incident scenes. These restraint decisions are a source of concern, with paramedics fearing patients coming to harm and the potential for detrimental professional repercussions. Decision-making was complicated by mismatched levels of education specific to restraint and the management of ABD patients, and the requirements of ‘real world’ clinical practice. The social relationships between paramedics and others at incident scenes were also important, with paramedics situating ABD incidents as healthcare rather than law enforcement encounters key to influencing restraint decisions.
conclusionsOur results indicated that paramedics would benefit from further education which is specific to identifying and managing the complex social interactions which occur at ABD scenes. High-fidelity simulation training delivered jointly with other agencies may be a helpful intervention in achieving this.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.