ReviewInternational psychogeriatrics2026
Brief operationalized psychosocial interventions for agitation and psychosis: Use in clinical trials and clinical care.
Review in International psychogeriatrics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundNeuropsychiatric symptoms such as agitation and/or psychosis impact most individuals with dementia during their illness, leading to reduced quality of life, distress, more rapid clinical decline, and an increased risk of institutionalization. Widely used pharmacological approaches have modest benefits and are associated with significant adverse events.
methodsA narrative review was conducted to examine the evidence for the benefits of non-pharmacological treatments for agitation and psychosis in people with dementia, with a focus on operationalized approaches that could readily be introduced into clinical practice. In the absence of substantial evidence pertaining to non-pharmacological treatments of psychosis, the review was supplemented with a secondary analysis of an existing WHELD/BPST dataset.
resultsThere is substantial evidence that simple non-pharmacological treatment approaches, such as personalized activities with social interaction, are effective in the treatment of agitation or enabling the reduction of psychotropic medication without worsening of agitation. Examples are presented of several operationalized approaches suitable for clinical implementation. In contrast, the treatment response of psychotic symptoms in people with dementia to non-pharmacological approaches is less clear cut. There is emerging evidence that although currently used non-pharmacological approaches do not directly improve psychosis in people with dementia, they do improve quality of life and concurrent neuropsychiatric symptoms such as apathy and agitation. DISCUSSION: Although best practice guidelines universally recommend non-pharmacological interventions as the first-line treatment for neuropsychiatric symptoms, implementation has been limited. Several tools, such as Brief Psychosocial Therapy, are described which may help bridge this gap into clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.