Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40713148›Full record

ArticleJACC. Advances2025

Cholesterol Levels and Cardiovascular Outcomes Following Statin Initiation for Primary Prevention: A Cohort Study.

Wade Thompson, Irene Jeong, Shalane Basque, Husam Abdel-Qadir, Peter C Austin, Dennis T Ko, Ida Famiyeh, Anna Chu, Jiming Fang, Ayodele Odutayo and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JACC. Advances, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Wade ThompsonWomen's College Research Institute, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; ICES, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Research Unit of General Practice, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark; Department of Anesthesiology, Pharmacology, and Therapeutics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Irene JeongICES, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Shalane BasqueICES, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Husam Abdel-QadirInstitute of Health Policy, Management, and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Department of Medicine, Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Peter Munk Cardiac Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Cardiovascular Division, Department of Medicine, Women's College Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Peter C AustinICES, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Institute of Health Policy, Management, and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Dennis T KoICES, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Institute of Health Policy, Management, and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Department of Medicine, Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Schulich Heart Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Ida FamiyehDepartment of Medicine, Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Anna ChuICES, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Jiming FangICES, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Ayodele OdutayoDepartment of Medicine, Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Cardiovascular Division, Department of Medicine, Women's College Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Division of Nephrology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Division of Nephrology, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Cynthia A JackeviciusICES, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Institute of Health Policy, Management, and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Department of Pharmacy Practice and Administration, Western University of Health Sciences, Pomona, California, USA.
Lucas C GodoyICES, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Institute of Health Policy, Management, and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Department of Medicine, Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Peter Munk Cardiac Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Douglas S LeeICES, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Institute of Health Policy, Management, and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Department of Medicine, Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Peter Munk Cardiac Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Todd J AndersonCumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada; Libin Cardiovascular Institute, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Jacob A UdellICES, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Institute of Health Policy, Management, and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Department of Medicine, Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Peter Munk Cardiac Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Cardiovascular Division, Department of Medicine, Women's College Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. Electronic address: jay.udell@utoronto.ca.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNon-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) is increasingly incorporated into guidelines along with low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) to guide lipid-lowering therapy decisions.

objectivesThe purpose of this study was to examine patterns of LDL-C and non-HDL-C levels after statin initiation for primary prevention and their association with incident cardiovascular events.

methodsThis was a population-based cohort study in Ontario, Canada, among persons aged ≥66 years starting a statin for primary prevention between January 1, 2012, and December 31, 2019. We identified those with a lipid panel in the 1-year after starting a statin and categorized individuals based on LDL-C and non-HDL-C thresholds for intensification in the 2021 Canadian Cardiovascular Society dyslipidemia guidelines. We stratified by diabetes/chronic kidney disease (CKD) status. The primary outcome was the composite of all-cause mortality or cardiovascular events, with follow-up to December 31, 2020. We used a Cox proportional hazards model for analysis.

resultsOur cohort comprised 125,013 people. The median follow-up was 2.5 years. Compared with those meeting both LDL-C and non-HDL-C thresholds, being above both thresholds was associated with an increased rate of the primary outcome for people without diabetes/CKD (HR: 1.10; 95% CI: 1.05-1.15) and for those with diabetes/CKD (HR: 1.16; 95% CI: 1.09-1.23). Being below the LDL-C threshold but above non-HDL-C threshold was associated with an increased rate of the primary outcome for people with diabetes/CKD (HR: 1.16; 95% CI: 1.03-1.30).

conclusionsThese findings support the residual risk associated with incompletely controlled LDL-C or non-HDL-C levels after statin initiation for primary prevention.

Indexed as

clinical practice guidelinelipidsprimary preventionstatins

Identifiers

PMID40713148
PMCPMC12418469

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.