ArticleJACC. Advances2025
Cholesterol Levels and Cardiovascular Outcomes Following Statin Initiation for Primary Prevention: A Cohort Study.
Article in JACC. Advances, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundNon-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) is increasingly incorporated into guidelines along with low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) to guide lipid-lowering therapy decisions.
objectivesThe purpose of this study was to examine patterns of LDL-C and non-HDL-C levels after statin initiation for primary prevention and their association with incident cardiovascular events.
methodsThis was a population-based cohort study in Ontario, Canada, among persons aged ≥66 years starting a statin for primary prevention between January 1, 2012, and December 31, 2019. We identified those with a lipid panel in the 1-year after starting a statin and categorized individuals based on LDL-C and non-HDL-C thresholds for intensification in the 2021 Canadian Cardiovascular Society dyslipidemia guidelines. We stratified by diabetes/chronic kidney disease (CKD) status. The primary outcome was the composite of all-cause mortality or cardiovascular events, with follow-up to December 31, 2020. We used a Cox proportional hazards model for analysis.
resultsOur cohort comprised 125,013 people. The median follow-up was 2.5 years. Compared with those meeting both LDL-C and non-HDL-C thresholds, being above both thresholds was associated with an increased rate of the primary outcome for people without diabetes/CKD (HR: 1.10; 95% CI: 1.05-1.15) and for those with diabetes/CKD (HR: 1.16; 95% CI: 1.09-1.23). Being below the LDL-C threshold but above non-HDL-C threshold was associated with an increased rate of the primary outcome for people with diabetes/CKD (HR: 1.16; 95% CI: 1.03-1.30).
conclusionsThese findings support the residual risk associated with incompletely controlled LDL-C or non-HDL-C levels after statin initiation for primary prevention.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.