ArticleBMJ open2025
Hyperosmolar therapy for severe subarachnoid haemorrhage: a protocol for a multicentre prospective observational study (OSMO-SAH study).
Article in BMJ open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05858060 (Practice of Osmotherapy in Severe SubArachnoid Hemorrhage Patients), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Practice of Osmotherapy in Severe SubArachnoid Hemorrhage Patients: Multicenter Observational Study (OSMO-SAH Study)
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Longitudinal Sodium Dynamics After Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage: A Single-Center Cohort Study with a Contemporary Literature Review.Biomedicines · 2026Article
- Association between trajectory of intracranial pressure and all-cause mortality in patients with non-traumatic subarachnoid hemorrhage: A retrospective cohort study from 2008 to 2022.Neurosurgical review · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionHyperosmolar therapy is crucial for the management of cerebral oedema and high intracranial pressure. Mannitol and hypertonic saline (HTS) at different concentrations are commonly used in clinical practice, but evidence of their use is mostly derived from studies about traumatic brain injury. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of hyperosmolar therapy for severe aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage (SAH). METHODS AND
designThis is a prospective multicentre observational study in which adult patients with severe aneurysmal SAH (Hunt-Hess score ≥3) will be enrolled. At least 124 patients will be enrolled over 2 years. Each enrolled patient will be treated in accordance with relevant management guidelines. The hypertonic agent used will be 20% mannitol (3 mL/kg) or 10% sodium chloride (HTS) (1 mL/kg). The choice and daily dose of the hypertonic agent will be determined by the attending doctor. The primary outcome will be the modified Rankin scale (mRS) score at 30 days after ictus. The secondary outcomes will be the mRS score at 6 months and the incidence of complications during hospitalisation, including phlebitis, acute kidney injury (AKI), hypokalaemia, hyperkalaemia, hyponatraemia, hypernatraemia, vessel spasm, delayed cerebral ischaemia (DCI), subdural effusion and hydrocephalus. An mRS score 0-2 will indicate a favourable outcome, whereas an mRS score 3-6 will indicate an unfavourable outcome. Logistic analysis will be performed to evaluate the association between the hyperosmolar agent and outcome (favourable or unfavourable). DISCUSSIONS: The aim of this multicentre observational study is to provide evidence on the efficacy and safety of hyperosmolar therapy for severe aneurysmal SAH. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Xuanwu Hospital (approval date: 10 July 2023) under protocol V.2.0 (version date: 26 April 2023) (reference number: [2023]086). The results will be published in a peer-reviewed journal and reported at relevant professional conferences. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT05858060.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.