ReviewJournal of medical radiation sciences2025
Simulation-Free Palliative Radiation Therapy: Implementing the Value-Based and Easier-Access Model of Care in a Rural Setting.
Review in Journal of medical radiation sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Prospective feasibility study of diagnostic CT-based simulation-free palliative radiotherapy.Journal of radiation research · 2026Trial
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Palliative radiation therapy (RT) is a vital treatment modality for managing symptoms from metastatic disease, but access barriers and workflow inefficiencies can delay or preclude care delivery. Simulation-free RT (SFRT) offers an effective, value-based solution by eliminating the traditional computed tomography (CT) simulation process and utilising existing diagnostic or staging CT scans for treatment planning. This process reduces patient burden and accelerates time to treatment, prioritising patient-centred care over traditional treatment pathways. Key technical considerations include managing dosimetric and geometric variations through appropriate patient selection and quality assurance processes. The successful implementation of SFRT requires a collaborative, multidisciplinary team approach, drawing on expertise from established centres to familiarise the team with the process. Access to diverse diagnostic imaging datasets and collaboration with various imaging providers is crucial. While careful patient selection is essential, our experience demonstrates that SFRT exemplifies value-based healthcare principles by optimising resource utilisation while prioritising patient-centred care, particularly valuable in rural settings where travel distances significantly impact treatment access. This paper aims to review the benefits and technical aspects, as well as provide key considerations for implementing SFRT in palliative RT settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.