ArticleThe American journal of cardiology2025
Maternal Cardiac and Perinatal Outcomes Among Pregnant Individuals With Ebstein's Anomaly.
Article in The American journal of cardiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Association of Maternal Cardiac Arrhythmias with Pregnancy Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Impact of Cardiac Arrhythmias on Acute Maternal Cardiovascular Outcomes in Pregnancy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Transient Receptor Potential Melastatin 4 (TRPM4) is associated with an immuno-stimulatory TME and better prognosis in BLCA.Discover oncology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Ebstein's anomaly is a rare congenital cardiac condition with limited data regarding the impact of this condition in pregnancy. The objective of this study was to describe the cardiac and perinatal outcomes associated with Ebstein's anomaly in pregnancy. We performed a retrospective cohort of pregnancies from Epic Cosmos, an integrated dataset from over 1,500 hospitals across the United States. Charts were queried for the coexistence of pregnancy and Ebstein's anomaly diagnosis code between July 5, 2021, and March 5, 2025. They were then compared to patients with other congenital heart disease by ICD-10 code and patients with no history of congenital heart disease. Patients with Ebstein's anomaly were also then further stratified by cardiac arrhythmia status. Demographics and clinical characteristics were abstracted and compared utilizing student t-test, ANOVA, or Chi-square where appropriate. During the study period, 261 individuals with maternal Ebstein's anomaly and pregnancy were identified. They were compared to 20,746 pregnant patients with other congenital heart disease and 5,048,035 pregnant patients with no history of Ebstein's congenital heart disease. There were statistically significant differences by age, race, ethnicity, and body mass index across all 3 groups. There were also statistically significant differences in cardiac outcomes of arrhythmia and heart failure and perinatal outcomes of gestational age of at delivery and mode of delivery across groups. Approximately 41% of pregnant individuals with Ebstein's anomaly developed a cardiac arrhythmia, while 18.4% developed heart failure. In conclusion, Ebstein's anomaly is associated with significant cardiac risks in pregnancy, including cardiac arrhythmia and heart failure.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.