ArticleNursing outlook
Making nursing visible: AI-assisted standardization of electronic health record interventions using generative pre-trained transformer models and retrieval-augmented generation process.
Article in Nursing outlook. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundNurses provide essential care that significantly impacts patient outcomes. However, nursing care is rarely examined due to a lack of standardized nurse-generated data suitable for large-scale analysis. PURPOSE: To test the performance of retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) and generative pre-trained transformer (GPT) models in standardizing electronic health records nursing intervention terms.
methodsThe process involved: (a) manually mapping a subset of local terms to standardized terms to create a "gold standard" for comparison, (b) implementing and assessing the RAG pipeline with GPT models for standardization, and (c) incorporating the output into an AI-assisted manual mapping workflow. DISCUSSION: GPT models were comparable to human mappers but lacked sufficient accuracy for fully automated mapping.
conclusionAlthough GPT models are not yet reliable for full automation, they can reduce human workload and streamline the standardization process. This advancement represents an important step toward making nursing contributions visible through data-driven evaluation of nursing practices.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.