ArticleJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA2026
Using transfer learning to improve prediction of suicide risk in acute care hospitals.
Article in Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Life events extraction from healthcare notes for veteran acute suicide risk prediction.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveEmerging efforts to identify patients at risk of suicide have focused on the development of predictive algorithms for use in healthcare settings. We address a major challenge in effective risk modeling in healthcare settings with insufficient data with which to create and apply risk models. This study aimed to improve risk prediction using transfer learning or data fusion by incorporating risk information from external data sources to augment the data available in particular clinical settings. MATERIALS AND
methodsIn this retrospective study, we developed predictive models in individual Connecticut hospitals using medical claims data. We compared conventional models containing demographics and historical medical diagnosis codes with fusion models containing conventional features and fused risk information that described similarities in historical diagnosis codes between patients from the hospital and patients receiving care for suicide attempts at other hospitals.
resultsOur sample contained 27 hospitals and 636 758 18- to 64-year-old patients. Fusion improved prediction for 93% of hospitals, while slightly worsening prediction for 7%. Median areas under the ROC and precision-recall curves of conventional models were 77.6% and 3.4%, respectively. Fusion improved these metrics by a median of 3.3 and 0.3 points, respectively (Ps < .001). Median sensitivities and positive predictive values at 90% and 95% specificity were also improved (Ps < .001). DISCUSSION: This study provided strong evidence that data fusion improved model performance across hospitals. Improvement was of greatest magnitude in facilities treating relatively few suicidal patients.
conclusionData fusion holds promise as a methodology to improve suicide risk prediction in healthcare settings with limited or incomplete data.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.