Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40711844›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA2026

Using transfer learning to improve prediction of suicide risk in acute care hospitals.

Shane J Sacco, Kun Chen, Fei Wang, Steven C Rogers, Robert H Aseltine

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Life events extraction from healthcare notes for veteran acute suicide risk prediction.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Shane J SaccoDepartment of Statistics, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT 06269, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-4920-8219
Kun ChenDepartment of Statistics, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT 06269, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-3579-5467
Fei WangCenter for Population Health, University of Connecticut Health Center, Farmington, CT 06030, United States.
Steven C RogersCenter for Population Health, University of Connecticut Health Center, Farmington, CT 06030, United States.
Robert H AseltineCenter for Population Health, University of Connecticut Health Center, Farmington, CT 06030, United States.

Funding

Developing Suicide Risk Algorithms for Diverse Clinical Settings using Data FusionR01MH124740 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT SCH OF MED/DNT · PI ASELTINE, ROBERT H, CHEN, KUN · 2020 to 2023
$3.2M
Improving the Identification of Patients at Risk of SuicideR01MH112148 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT SCH OF MED/DNT · PI ASELTINE, ROBERT H · 2017 to 2020
$2.7M
NIMH NIH HHS R01MH112148NIMH NIH HHS R01MH124740
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveEmerging efforts to identify patients at risk of suicide have focused on the development of predictive algorithms for use in healthcare settings. We address a major challenge in effective risk modeling in healthcare settings with insufficient data with which to create and apply risk models. This study aimed to improve risk prediction using transfer learning or data fusion by incorporating risk information from external data sources to augment the data available in particular clinical settings. MATERIALS AND

methodsIn this retrospective study, we developed predictive models in individual Connecticut hospitals using medical claims data. We compared conventional models containing demographics and historical medical diagnosis codes with fusion models containing conventional features and fused risk information that described similarities in historical diagnosis codes between patients from the hospital and patients receiving care for suicide attempts at other hospitals.

resultsOur sample contained 27 hospitals and 636 758 18- to 64-year-old patients. Fusion improved prediction for 93% of hospitals, while slightly worsening prediction for 7%. Median areas under the ROC and precision-recall curves of conventional models were 77.6% and 3.4%, respectively. Fusion improved these metrics by a median of 3.3 and 0.3 points, respectively (Ps < .001). Median sensitivities and positive predictive values at 90% and 95% specificity were also improved (Ps < .001). DISCUSSION: This study provided strong evidence that data fusion improved model performance across hospitals. Improvement was of greatest magnitude in facilities treating relatively few suicidal patients.

conclusionData fusion holds promise as a methodology to improve suicide risk prediction in healthcare settings with limited or incomplete data.

Indexed as

Machine LearningSuicideAdolescentAdultAlgorithmsConnecticutFemaleHospitalsHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesRisk AssessmentROC CurveYoung Adultdata fusionhealthcaremachine learningpredictionsuicide

Identifiers

PMID40711844
PMCPMC12758463

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.